Hi Reto,

I can not remember changing anything in the
SingleTdbDatasetTcProvider. I have only fixed bugs in the
IndexedMGraph (e.g. the comparator bug with bNodes you reported)

best
Rupert

On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Rupert
>
> I agree re. the name. IIRC you recently fixed an issue in the current
> SingleTdbDatasetTcProvider. Do you remember what this was about?
>
> Cheers,
> Reto
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Rupert Westenthaler
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am fine with replacing the SingleTdbDatasetTcProvider with the more
>> advanced ScalableSingleTdbDatasetTcProvider. However I would suggest
>> to keep SingleTdbDatasetTcProvider as name for the component.
>>
>> best
>> Rupert
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Minto van der Sluis <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> The SingleTdbDatasetTcProvider  probably performs a little better for a
>>>> small number of graphs. Otherwise I see no real benefit.
>>>
>>> This seems to be a week reason for keeping those 817 lines of code.
>>> Maybe @Ruperts knows more reasons?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Reto
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> | Rupert Westenthaler             [email protected]
>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11                             ++43-699-11108907
>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen



-- 
| Rupert Westenthaler             [email protected]
| Bodenlehenstraße 11                             ++43-699-11108907
| A-5500 Bischofshofen

Reply via email to