Hi Hasan In principle we could also have it our main git repo (as we could in principle have all our projects in different git repos). I just would prefer a separate one for this, so that it can be more easily cloned in the discussions around rdf commons. Because that is the code that should in part or in full be replaced by rdf-commons.
Cheers, Reto On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 7:23 AM, Hasan Hasan <[email protected]> wrote: > Assuming in the end we have a new rdf-core from this separate git repo, > How are we going to reintegrate this into clerezza codes? Will it be a > smooth > evolution or a major change? > > What makes this different from a branch besides the release needs? > > Cheers > Hasan > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Reto Gmür <[email protected]> wrote: > > > There would be releases as to allow the other clerezza modules to evolve. > > > > Cheers, > > Reto > > > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Would there be releases from this repository, or are you thinking more > > like > > > a branch-like experimental area? > > > On 26 Feb 2015 13:52, "Reto Gmür" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > To facilitate migration to a future RDF Commons in Clerezza I would > > like > > > to > > > > suggest to start a new Git repository for the clerezza core rdf > > projects. > > > > The idea is to have code that gradually evolves to being closer to > what > > > > will be RDF Commons as to allow a smooth and iterative evolution of > the > > > > other clerezza code. Currently there is some code commons sandbox but > > > this > > > > doesn't seem to be a good approach. > > > > > > > > Any opposition for asking infra for a clerezza-rdf-core git repo? > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Reto > > > > > > > > > >
