OK. I see your argument. +1 for asking infra to have a separate repo On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Reto Gmür <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Hasan > > In principle we could also have it our main git repo (as we could in > principle have all our projects in different git repos). I just would > prefer a separate one for this, so that it can be more easily cloned in the > discussions around rdf commons. Because that is the code that should in > part or in full be replaced by rdf-commons. > > Cheers, > Reto > > > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 7:23 AM, Hasan Hasan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Assuming in the end we have a new rdf-core from this separate git repo, > > How are we going to reintegrate this into clerezza codes? Will it be a > > smooth > > evolution or a major change? > > > > What makes this different from a branch besides the release needs? > > > > Cheers > > Hasan > > > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Reto Gmür <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > There would be releases as to allow the other clerezza modules to > evolve. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Reto > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Would there be releases from this repository, or are you thinking > more > > > like > > > > a branch-like experimental area? > > > > On 26 Feb 2015 13:52, "Reto Gmür" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > To facilitate migration to a future RDF Commons in Clerezza I would > > > like > > > > to > > > > > suggest to start a new Git repository for the clerezza core rdf > > > projects. > > > > > The idea is to have code that gradually evolves to being closer to > > what > > > > > will be RDF Commons as to allow a smooth and iterative evolution of > > the > > > > > other clerezza code. Currently there is some code commons sandbox > but > > > > this > > > > > doesn't seem to be a good approach. > > > > > > > > > > Any opposition for asking infra for a clerezza-rdf-core git repo? > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > Reto > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
