Just a few quick things...  cloudbr0 is being set as your guest bridge,
right? See /etc/cloud/agent/agent.properties

Is there a /proc/net/vlan/bond0.60? If so, can you send the contents? It
should be building guest bridges off of whatever is listed in the "Device:"
line in this file.

There should also be some logs in the /var/log/cloud/agent/agent.log file
that might indicate what's going on.


On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Marcus Sorensen (JIRA) <[email protected]>wrote:

>
>     [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13629015#comment-13629015]
>
> Marcus Sorensen commented on CLOUDSTACK-2008:
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> I'll take a look at this when I get a moment, I'll wait until I have time
> before assigning it to myself.  I'm thinking this has to do with the 'bond'
> device, since it's normally supposed to look in /proc/net/vlan, to see if
> the parent interface is tagged, and then look up the parent of THAT
> interface.
>
>
>
>
>
> > guest network vlan tag chain issue
> > ----------------------------------
> >
> >                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-2008
> >                 URL:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2008
> >             Project: CloudStack
> >          Issue Type: Bug
> >      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
> >          Components: Network Controller
> >    Affects Versions: 4.0.1
> >         Environment: centos 6.4
> > HP BL460 G1
> >            Reporter: danny webb
> >            Priority: Minor
> >
> > Hi,
> > I have setup a cloudstack instance where my "root" eth device is a vlan
> tagged bond0.60 (as the network I am on has a different default VLAN id
> than my test vlans).
> > so I am setup like this:
> >     bond0.60 / cloudbr0 == management network / ip of box (bond0 ==
> nothing)
> >
> >     bond0.60  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:17:A4:77:48:3C
> >               inet6 addr: fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:483c/64 Scope:Link
> >               UP BROADCAST RUNNING MASTER MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
> >               RX packets:37189 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> >               TX packets:34030 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> >               collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> >               RX bytes:4476334 (4.2 MiB)  TX bytes:31055747 (29.6 MiB)
> >     cloudbr0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:17:A4:77:48:3C
> >               inet addr:172.18.102.8  Bcast:172.18.102.255
>  Mask:255.255.255.0
> >               inet6 addr: fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:483c/64 Scope:Link
> >               UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
> >               RX packets:36531 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> >               TX packets:32606 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> >               collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> >               RX bytes:4435824 (4.2 MiB)  TX bytes:30976056 (29.5 MiB)
> >
> > when it went to setup a new guest network (with a vlan id of 80) it
> created it ontop of the bond0.60 like:
> >
> >     bond0.60.80 Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:17:A4:77:48:3C
> >               inet6 addr: fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:483c/64 Scope:Link
> >               UP BROADCAST RUNNING MASTER MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
> >               RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> >               TX packets:70 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> >               collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> >               RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:13777 (13.4 KiB)
> >
> >     [root@slo-cnkvm004 ~]# brctl show
> >     bridge name     bridge id               STP enabled     interfaces
> >     cloud0          8000.000000000000       no
> >     cloudVirBr80            8000.0017a477483c       no
>  bond0.60.80
> >
> > which doesn't seem to work and I am pretty sure is syntactically wrong.
>  I can't ping any guests that come up on that network.  When creating new
> devices it should I believe be creating them off of the base eth device (ie
> eth0, or bond0).
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA
> administrators
> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>

Reply via email to