> On April 12, 2013, 8:33 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> > test/integration/smoke/test_volumes.py, line 570
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/10393/diff/1/?file=280213#file280213line570>
> >
> >     Why would a sleep be required here? Can you add a comment for why?

removed it


> On April 12, 2013, 8:33 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> > test/integration/smoke/test_volumes.py, line 576
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/10393/diff/1/?file=280213#file280213line576>
> >
> >     This sleep can also be removed since virtual_machine.stop returns only 
> > after the VM moves to stopped state.

removed it


> On April 12, 2013, 8:33 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> > test/integration/smoke/test_volumes.py, line 612
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/10393/diff/1/?file=280213#file280213line612>
> >
> >     Same as above.

removed it


- SrikanteswaraRao


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10393/#review19057
-----------------------------------------------------------


On April 15, 2013, 6:08 a.m., SrikanteswaraRao Talluri wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/10393/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 15, 2013, 6:08 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack, Prasanna Santhanam and Marcus Sorensen.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
>  Based on hypervisor, resizeVolume needs VM to be in stopped state for 
> xenserver.
> 
> Earlier tests had volume not attached, Hence, resize is failing 
> 
> 
> This addresses bug CLOUDSTACK-1995.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   test/integration/smoke/test_volumes.py 36eb5de 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10393/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Tested with KVM and XenServer hypervisors with local storage. I couldn't test 
> on shared storage because of a bug related to primary storage
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> SrikanteswaraRao Talluri
> 
>

Reply via email to