Hello Hiroaki, I assume so as well, though UI must admit this is because I do not see a clear difference between 'isolation method' and 'broadcast domain type'. It is the latter I am targeting. The idea is to specify a uri for the desired net, the private gateway interface should be on and let the scheme decide what kind of broadcast domain( == isolation method???) we are planning to be in.
Regards, -----Original Message----- From: Hiroaki KAWAI [mailto:ka...@stratosphere.co.jp] Sent: zaterdag 11 mei 2013 10:28 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: network guru refactor proposal +1 for the basic idea. Non-guest networks are not easy to virtualize now. I assume you're talking about the isolation method in non-guest networks. (2013/05/07 20:53), Daan Hoogland wrote: > LS, > > I want to refactor the network guru hierarchy to put som functionality in > abstract base classes. This will come down to extending the hierarchy for > guest networks to include all gurus. Are there any thoughts or gotchas to > share? > > This would be the second part of a three stage strategy I have to support > creating a nicira hosted private gateway for vpcs. > The first one is making sure vlans are specified as uri throughout the > system. I will be submitting a patch for review for this part soon. > The last part will be creating a guru based on Hugo's > NiciraNvpGuestNetworkGuru. > > Any comment is appreciated, > Daan Hoogland >
