Would this not be a problem for folks who are already on 4.0 ? On 13/05/13 9:22 PM, "Chip Childers" <chipchild...@apache.org> wrote:
> >----------------------------------------------------------- >This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: >https://reviews.apache.org/r/11088/#review20489 >----------------------------------------------------------- > >Ship it! > > >In 4.1: > >commit 5ccdf7dc4ad86145633124b9540aadfbfc423f6f >Author: Wei Zhou <w.z...@leaseweb.com> >Date: Mon May 13 16:50:29 2013 +0100 > > CLOUDSTACK-528: Correct a bunch of mistakes in the 3.0.x to 4.0 db > script > Signed-off-by: Chip Childers <chip.child...@gmail.com> > >- Chip Childers > > >On May 13, 2013, 3:38 p.m., Wei Zhou wrote: >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------- >> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: >> https://reviews.apache.org/r/11088/ >> ----------------------------------------------------------- >> >> (Updated May 13, 2013, 3:38 p.m.) >> >> >> Review request for cloudstack and Chip Childers. >> >> >> Description >> ------- >> >> There are some mistakes in configuration table. >> fixed them by this patch. >> >> >> This addresses bug CLOUDSTACK-528. >> >> >> Diffs >> ----- >> >> setup/db/db/schema-302to40.sql a947ac1 >> >> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11088/diff/ >> >> >> Testing >> ------- >> >> Nicolas has tested it. >> We also need an additional patch for the following new issue (Advanced >>Network with Security Groups). >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Wei Zhou >> >> >
