+1.

4.2 carries some important changes for the long run, giving it more time
would help a smooth release in the final

Kelven

On 6/3/13 10:55 AM, "Edison Su" <edison...@citrix.com> wrote:

>+1[binding] on pushing back feature freeze date.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
>> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 8:00 AM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: [VOTE] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze
>> 
>> Following our discussion on the proposal to push back the feature freeze
>> date for 4.2.0 [1], we have not yet achieved a clear consensus.  Well...
>> we have already defined the "project rules" for figuring out what to do.
>> In out project by-laws [2], we have defined a "release plan" decision as
>> follows:
>> 
>> > 3.4.2. Release Plan
>> >
>> > Defines the timetable and work items for a release. The plan also
>> > nominates a Release Manager.
>> >
>> > A lazy majority of active committers is required for approval.
>> >
>> > Any active committer or PMC member may call a vote. The vote must
>> > occur on a project development mailing list.
>> 
>> And our lazy majority is defined as:
>> 
>> > 3.2.2. Lazy Majority - A lazy majority vote requires 3 binding +1
>> > votes and more binding +1 votes than binding -1 votes.
>> 
>> Our current plan is the starting point, so this VOTE is a vote to
>>change the
>> current plan.  We require a 72 hour window for this vote, so IMO we are
>>in an
>> odd position where the feature freeze date is at least extended until
>> Tuesday of next week.
>> 
>> Our current plan of record for 4.2.0 is at [3].
>> 
>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/vi3nsd2yo763kzua
>> [2] http://s.apache.org/csbylaws
>> [3]
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Cloudstack+4.2+
>> Release
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> I'd like to call a VOTE on the following:
>> 
>> Proposal: Extend the feature freeze date for our 4.2.0 feature release
>>from
>> today (2013-05-31) to 2013-06-28.  All other dates following the feature
>> freeze date in the plan would be pushed out 4 weeks as well.
>> 
>> Please respond with one of the following:
>> 
>> +1 : change the plan as listed above
>> +/-0 : no strong opinion, but leaning + or -
>> -1 : do not change the plan
>> 
>> This vote will remain open until Tuesday morning US eastern time.
>> 
>> -chip

Reply via email to