Hi, Yeah, I should have been more explicit in what problem I was seeing. :)
What I'm seeing is that I set the field with a string (IQN) that is not null, but it doesn't make it to the DB. I have other, similar "sets" and all is well with them (their data make it to the DB just fine). Perhaps it's getting overwritten later in the processing with a null. I'll have to look into it more. I'm actually on master, as well. I do see an "iscsi_name" field. varchar(255) in the cloud.volumes table. I haven't updated in a week or so, but I doubt the column's been removed. Strange. I'm developing a storage plug-in which creates an iSCSI volume on a SAN and I just wanted to use (what I thought was) an existing column to store the IQN. It looked like the "iscsi_name" column would be a good place to store this info. Thanks! On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Vijayendra Bhamidipati < vijayendra.bhamidip...@citrix.com> wrote: > Hi Mike, > > You're probably calling those setter methods in the constructor and I > don't see any problem having an '_' in the function name. What is the > problem you're seeing? > > Also I don't see this iscsi_name in VolumeVO.java on master - I'm guessing > you're working off a private branch. > > I'm yet to go through your earlier mails on the alias - so sorry for the > following question if it has already been discussed - why do you want to > put an iscsi iqn here in volumeVO? Isn't it better to put in a class of its > own that derives VolumeVO? > > Regards, > Vijay > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > Sent: Friday, June 07, 2013 2:52 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Quick DB Question > > Hi, > > I'd like to place an IQN in the "iscsi_name" field available in the > cloud.volumes table after I create an appropriate iSCSI target on a SAN. > > For some reason, we don't seem to be using this column in the VolumeVO > class, so I went ahead and added access to it. > > I've successfully added columns to tables before in CloudStack and created > read/write access to them, but I am - for some reason - having trouble with > this "iscsi_name" column. > > In the VolumeVO class, I've added the following (below). Can anyone see > any flaws in what I've done? I could have made the member variable private > (I just copied, pasted, and modified an existing field), but that shouldn't > matter for this purpose. I don't usually use the "_" in a method name, but > it just looked better to me in this case. > > Thanks! > > @Column(name = "iscsi_name") > > String iScsiName; > > > @Override > > public String get_iScsiName() { > > return this.iScsiName; > > } > > > > public void set_iScsiName(String iScsiName) { > > this.iScsiName = iScsiName; > > } > > > > -- > *Mike Tutkowski* > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com > o: 303.746.7302 > Advancing the way the world uses the > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play> > *(tm)* > -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play> *™*
