Thanks, guys!

On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Vijayendra Bhamidipati <
vijayendra.bhamidip...@citrix.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the info Alex! Btw there are two VolumeVO.java files in the src
> and Edison will be removing one of them when he merges the object store
> branch into master.. you'll need to use
> engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeVO.java.
>
> Regards,
> Vijay
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 07, 2013 3:19 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Quick DB Question
>
> Mike,
>
> The Data Access Layer page[1] have the answer to this.   Specifically this
> particular part in the example.
>
>     // getters and setters must follow the Java
>     // convention of putting get/set in front of
>     // the field name.
>     public String getText() {
>         return text;
>     }
>
> get_iscsiName is not a Java coding convention.  We should not use it.  The
> coding convention is "get" followed by the variable name with the first
> character capitalized.
>
> --Alex
> [1]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Data+Access+Layer
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> > Sent: Friday, June 7, 2013 3:12 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Quick DB Question
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Yeah, I should have been more explicit in what problem I was seeing.
> > :)
> >
> > What I'm seeing is that I set the field with a string (IQN) that is
> > not null, but it doesn't make it to the DB.
> >
> > I have other, similar "sets" and all is well with them (their data
> > make it to the DB just fine).
> >
> > Perhaps it's getting overwritten later in the processing with a null.
> > I'll have to look into it more.
> >
> > I'm actually on master, as well. I do see an "iscsi_name" field.
> > varchar(255) in the cloud.volumes table. I haven't updated in a week
> > or so, but I doubt the column's been removed. Strange.
> >
> > I'm developing a storage plug-in which creates an iSCSI volume on a
> > SAN and I just wanted to use (what I thought was) an existing column to
> store the IQN.
> > It looked like the "iscsi_name" column would be a good place to store
> > this info.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Vijayendra Bhamidipati <
> > vijayendra.bhamidip...@citrix.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Mike,
> > >
> > > You're probably calling those setter methods in the constructor and
> > > I don't see any problem having an '_' in the function name. What is
> > > the problem you're seeing?
> > >
> > > Also I don't see this iscsi_name in VolumeVO.java on master - I'm
> > > guessing you're working off a private branch.
> > >
> > > I'm yet to go through your earlier mails on the alias - so sorry for
> > > the following question if it has already been discussed - why do you
> > > want to put an iscsi iqn here in volumeVO? Isn't it better to put in
> > > a class of its own that derives VolumeVO?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Vijay
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, June 07, 2013 2:52 PM
> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Subject: Quick DB Question
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'd like to place an IQN in the "iscsi_name" field available in the
> > > cloud.volumes table after I create an appropriate iSCSI target on a
> SAN.
> > >
> > > For some reason, we don't seem to be using this column in the
> > > VolumeVO class, so I went ahead and added access to it.
> > >
> > > I've successfully added columns to tables before in CloudStack and
> > > created read/write access to them, but I am - for some reason -
> > > having trouble with this "iscsi_name" column.
> > >
> > > In the VolumeVO class, I've added the following (below). Can anyone
> > > see any flaws in what I've done? I could have made the member
> > > variable private (I just copied, pasted, and modified an existing
> > > field), but that shouldn't matter for this purpose. I don't usually
> > > use the "_" in a method name, but it just looked better to me in this
> case.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > >     @Column(name = "iscsi_name")
> > >
> > >     String iScsiName;
> > >
> > >
> > >     @Override
> > >
> > >     public String get_iScsiName() {
> > >
> > >     return this.iScsiName;
> > >
> > >     }
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >     public void set_iScsiName(String iScsiName) {
> > >
> > >     this.iScsiName = iScsiName;
> > >
> > >     }
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > > o: 303.746.7302
> > > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > > *(tm)*
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > o: 303.746.7302
> > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > *(tm)*
>



-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
*™*

Reply via email to