I totally agree. It would be a really tough decision to risk breaking environments that are using this feature.
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Alex Huang <alex.hu...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > > Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 7:25 AM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Cc: Edison Su > > Subject: Re: RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be > supported in > > 4.2? > > > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 07:08:41PM -0600, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > > > So, I haven't been following this thread in detail, but was curious: > > > If it's too much work to fix this by the end of the month (code > > > freeze), what are we planning on doing (moving 4.2 back or allowing > > > this feature to not exist in 4.2)? > > > > I'm personally not happy either way, but I'd much rather not break > existing > > environments in a new release on purpose. > > +1 Same thoughts here. > > --Alex > -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play> *™*
