If I start a vote it will be to adjust to the semantic versioning
system. I do not approve of the ubuntu scheme, sorry. I will probably
-0 just to get us moving forward but I think it is not the best for
us. So I'll wait a few and start a vote if no-one else did before me.

On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 12:48 PM Wido den Hollander
<w...@widodh.nl.invalid> wrote:
>
>
>
> Op 24/01/2024 om 00:27 schreef Wei ZHOU:
> > Yes, the ubuntu version naming is the best in my opinion.
> > Other than the version naming, we need to decide the frequency of major
> > releases and minor releases, which version will be LTS, how long the
> > LTS/normal version will be supported, etc.
> >
> > Maybe a vote in the dev/users/pmc mailing list?
> >
>
> I think that's a good decision.
>
> @ Daan: Do you want to start one?
>
> I'd prefer the YYYY.MM release schedule. We just need a good (blog)post
> to explain the new versioning.
>
> Wido
>
> >
> >
> > 在 2024年1月23日星期二,Nicolas Vazquez <nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> 写道:
> >
> >> I like this idea as well, even if its YYYY.MM or YY.MM.
> >>
> >> Would we want to define delivery months for releases similar to Ubuntu .04
> >> and .10?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Nicolas Vazquez
> >> ________________________________
> >> From: Nux <n...@li.nux.ro>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2024 6:11 PM
> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
> >> Cc: Wei ZHOU <ustcweiz...@gmail.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] version naming : drop the 4.
> >>
> >> An interesting proposition, I like it.
> >> It would also relieve us from having to come up with any over-the-top
> >> feature or change for a major version change.
> >>
> >> On 2024-01-23 14:49, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> >>> We could look at Ubuntu, and other projects, and call it 2025.01 if we
> >>> release it in Jan 2025.
> >>>
> >>> A great post on the website, mailinglists and social media could
> >>> explain the change in versioning, but that the code doesn't change that
> >>> much.
> >>>
> >>> Project has matured, etc, etc.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >



-- 
Daan

Reply via email to