Yes, the ubuntu version naming is the best in my opinion. Other than the version naming, we need to decide the frequency of major releases and minor releases, which version will be LTS, how long the LTS/normal version will be supported, etc.
Maybe a vote in the dev/users/pmc mailing list? 在 2024年1月23日星期二，Nicolas Vazquez <nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> 写道： > I like this idea as well, even if its YYYY.MM or YY.MM. > > Would we want to define delivery months for releases similar to Ubuntu .04 > and .10? > > Regards, > Nicolas Vazquez > ________________________________ > From: Nux <n...@li.nux.ro> > Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2024 6:11 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> > Cc: Wei ZHOU <ustcweiz...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] version naming : drop the 4. > > An interesting proposition, I like it. > It would also relieve us from having to come up with any over-the-top > feature or change for a major version change. > > On 2024-01-23 14:49, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > We could look at Ubuntu, and other projects, and call it 2025.01 if we > > release it in Jan 2025. > > > > A great post on the website, mailinglists and social media could > > explain the change in versioning, but that the code doesn't change that > > much. > > > > Project has matured, etc, etc. > > > >
