It's only two files and they were not that huge if I recall correctly from my quick glance.
--Alex > -----Original Message----- > From: Alex Huang > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:22 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar > > You can look at the code yourself and see if it's any different than what we > copied. > > http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/org.kuali.rice/rice- > impl/1.0.3.1- > BX/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl/EasySSLProtocolSocketFact > ory.java > > --Alex > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vase...@citrix.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:17 AM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > Thanks! I had looked at that initially, but found this disclaimer on > > the source website : > > "Warning: > > not-yet-commons-ssl-0.3.11 should be considered to be of "Alpha" > quality!" > > > > I do not see a code update in it for the past 4 years, and thus was > > skeptical. > > Please let me know if we should go ahead with it. > > > > Thanks, > > Amogh > > > > On 7/23/13 10:51 PM, "Alex Huang" <alex.hu...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > > >Amogh, > > > > > >I added the following to the pom.xml for cisco and it seems to > > >compile with a few extra exceptions try-catch added. Can you check > > >on if you can use this? > > > > > ><dependency> > > > <groupId>ca.juliusdavies</groupId> > > > <artifactId>not-yet-commons-ssl</artifactId> > > > <version>0.3.11</version> > > ></dependency> > > > > > >--Alx > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] > > >> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 10:25 PM > > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > >> Subject: RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar > > >> > > >> Isn't this in commons-httpclient 3.1? > > >> > > >> http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/commons- > > >> httpclient/commons- > > >> httpclient/3.1/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl/EasyX509Tr > > >> us > > >> tM > > >> anager.java > > >> > > >> --Alex > > >> > > >> > -----Original Message----- > > >> > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] > > >> > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 9:41 PM > > >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > >> > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar > > >> > > > >> > +1 > > >> > @Frank, it is not a re-implementation, but a copy. > > >> > > > >> > On 7/24/13 2:14 AM, "Amogh Vasekar" <amogh.vase...@citrix.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > >In the absence of an officially published jar on maven for > > >> > >contrib-ssl, the current idea is to put this package in > > >> > >cloud-utils (it is a dependency for both cisco-vnmc and ucs) for > > >> > >easier > > >>maintenance. > > >> > >Please let me know if this sounds good. > > >> > > > > >> > >Thanks, > > >> > >Amogh > > >> > > > > >> > >On 7/22/13 5:26 PM, "Frank Zhang" <frank.zh...@citrix.com> wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > >>I prefer to just use httpclient-contribs.jar as it has been > > >> > >>proven by lots of users. > > >> > >>Reimplementing such code brings no gain but maintenance effort. > > >> > >> > > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > > >> > >>> From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vase...@citrix.com] > > >> > >>> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 5:17 PM > > >> > >>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > >> > >>> Subject: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> Hi All, > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> I was working on a HTTPS related fix, and found this package > > >> > >>>in the codebase : > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/master/plugins/networ > > >> > >>> k- > > >> > >>> elements/c > > >> > >>> isco-vnmc/src/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> I need to use the same classes, which are already a part of > > >> > >>>httpclient-contribs jar > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>>(http://www.java2s.com/Code/Jar/c/Downloadcommonshttpclie > nt > > con > > >> tr > > >> > ib31jar. > > >> > >>> htm > > >> > >>> ) > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> Was wondering if there is a specific reason the jar was not > > >> > >>>included instead (probably since it is a contrib jar?) > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> Thanks, > > >> > >>> Amogh > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > >
