Hi Marty,
Here's the documentation for Routed Mode and Simple Dynamic Routing, I did the original design and my colleague @Wei Zhou<mailto:wei.z...@shapeblue.com> refined and implemented it. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=306153967 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=315492858 Cheers, Alex -----Original Message----- From: Marty Godsey <mar...@rudio.net> Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2024 11:07 AM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Port Forwarding in Network Thank you, Alex. I am excited about that addition. Even having the ability to not have to NAT is very useful. Regards, Marty Godsey Rudio, LLC Book Time: https://calendly.com/rudio-martyg Support: supp...@rudio.net<mailto:supp...@rudio.net?subject=Rudio%20Support<mailto:supp...@rudio.net%3cmailto:supp...@rudio.net?subject=Rudio%20Support>> Ph: 859-328-1100 The content of this email is intended for the person or entity to which it is addressed only. This email may contain confidential information. If you are not the person to whom this message is addressed, be aware that any use, reproduction, or distribution of this message is strictly prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and immediately delete this email and any attachments. From: Alex Mattioli <alex.matti...@shapeblue.com<mailto:alex.matti...@shapeblue.com>> Date: Tuesday, August 27, 2024 at 11:56 AM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:us...@cloudstack.apache.org> <us...@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:us...@cloudstack.apache.org>> Subject: RE: Port Forwarding in Network WARNING: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Marty, There are two PRs in progress, one for Routed Mode for IPv4 in Isolated Networks and VPCs and another for Simple Dynamic Route with BGP. With Routed Mode you'll be able to assign public IPs directly to VMs, this should be ready for ACS 4.20, which will be routed via the ACS VR. This has been possible for IPv6 since ACS 4.17 and will work in a similar way (with some differences) for IPv4. Here's a video explaining how it works for IPv6: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UvCSmU1TjRY&t=1583s As mentioned before, if you want to skip the VR completely then you need to use Shared Networks, but then end users can't deploy the networks themselves without operator intervention. Cheers Alex -----Original Message----- From: Jayanth Babu A <jayanth.b...@nxtgen.com.INVALID<mailto:jayanth.b...@nxtgen.com.INVALID>> Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2024 10:27 AM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:us...@cloudstack.apache.org> Subject: Re: Port Forwarding in Network Hi Marty, Please use Shared Networks [1]. [1] https://atpscan.global.hornetsecurity.com?d=xMOwK4fYoexeGDaCItpovxDkoPdExpSMKaLuotztWEw&f=1X9ll9UDNTAUv9XEhAoS-oCZLIFMKLOf3SQZgHrZSZlrXbexUH8NtKLJCqQbeAYB&i=&k=bm7B&m=x1rGyep2ImM3kF-8P6y1JWh7yEkoCGNNgU8oyJkxPaALdf4b2xt3n4PE01uT1okjgB6Kw5tM2yIKoLpa6cjYlK58irpRbdjWYflteXydz9OVb4jJgpLPFwQzFkj2QYTn&n=qT4mJ0BYBeh6jAxOCD1hayLTVyupmjmzwzzkOhAmOF4z7wMla_tk04lc9D939Rfl&r=IVbx63cjnjXzXq_Sv0qS0mvAEousFhnYo0ONd_j_NKawfjzf9DWkEB-VcJALkcaL&s=40bdd3dc1b6d4512eb8828b1f28bd4d08a871934dab0ba463a647f6e5f009a36&u=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.cloudstack.apache.org%2Fen%2Flatest%2Fadminguide%2Fnetworking.html%23shared-networks Thanks, Jayanth ________________________________ From: Marty Godsey <mar...@rudio.net<mailto:mar...@rudio.net>> Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2024 6:38:12 pm To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:us...@cloudstack.apache.org> <us...@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:us...@cloudstack.apache.org>> Subject: Re: Port Forwarding in Network This is what I went ahead and used. Has there been a feature request to create a way to directly provide a public IP to an instance instead of using a VR? Regards, Marty Godsey From: Jithin Raju <jithin.r...@shapeblue.com<mailto:jithin.r...@shapeblue.com>> Date: Tuesday, August 27, 2024 at 12:06 AM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:us...@cloudstack.apache.org> <us...@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:us...@cloudstack.apache.org>> Subject: Re: Port Forwarding in Network WARNING: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Marty, Could you use static NAT instead? -Jithin From: Marty Godsey <mar...@rudio.net<mailto:mar...@rudio.net>> Date: Monday, 26 August 2024 at 9:26 PM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:us...@cloudstack.apache.org> <us...@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:us...@cloudstack.apache.org>> Subject: Port Forwarding in Network Is there a way to easily forward all ports without having to put in 1 – 65525? I know it’s small and petty, but in other places, you can do a -1 to specify all. You don’t seem to be able to do that here. Regards, Marty Godsey Disclaimer *** This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you are not authorised to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents to any other person and any such actions are unlawful and strictly prohibited. This e-mail may contain viruses. NxtGen Datacenter & Cloud Technologies Private Ltd (“NxtGen”) has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk but is not liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. You should carry out your own virus checks before opening the e-mail or attachment. NxtGen reserves the right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this e-mail address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the NxtGen e-mail system. *** End of Disclaimer ***NXTGEN***
