Except that the separation only helps if it allows RC testing + voting during doc finalization. If we announce before docs, it hurts us. I'm against another announcement that goes out with the docs in poor shape.
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: > Unless there are objection to the RC, I would prefer to have it released and > make the announcement sooner and showcase in collab conference. As Chip > mentions docs were broken out separately anyway. > > Animesh > > > On 14/11/13 8:12 pm, "Sebastien Goasguen" <run...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>Anyway we can wait next week to release. >> >>quite a few of us will be together in Amsterdam, we can dedicate a >>hackathon session to 4.2.1 , make sure RN are good, upgrade path >>etcŠthen testŠ. >> >>I'd recommend keeping the vote open until then. >> >>-sebastien >> >> >>On Nov 14, 2013, at 5:57 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath >><radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> The master has the most up-to-date RN for 4.2.1. >>> >>> From: Abhinandan Prateek >>> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 2:22 PM >>> To: CloudStack Dev >>> Cc: Radhika Puthiyetath >>> Subject: Re: [ASF4.2.1] Release Notes >>> >>> >>> It seems the upgrade section of release notes will require a review, >>>probably followed by a revamp (?). >>> Can we have some volunteers who are familiar with various upgrade >>>paths comment on it ? >>> Me and Radhika will try to consolidate those comments, snippets and >>>fix the RN for 4.2.1. >>> >>> -abhi >>> >>> RN for 4.2.1 = >>>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-docs.git;a=tree;f >>>=re >>>lease-notes;h=8128d62c39236331492f3642914bf97b43ed2670;hb=refs/heads/4 >>>.2 >>> >> >
