There is absolutely no ASF rule or policy on this. It's up to projects to decide things like "what's in the release".
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > I can't imagine there not being some guideline or rule about providing > documentation in the apache foundation. Can we even release without docs, > not that we should. My idea was that we release on wednesday with the docs > in rc state. Even that is, admitted, dubious. > > mobile biligual spell checker used > Op 14 nov. 2013 22:50 schreef "David Nalley" <da...@gnsa.us>: > >> I agree - announcing a release prior to docs availability hurts the >> project because users fail in installation and upgrades. >> The gate in my mind is docs readiness - thats an integral part of the >> release process, even if the repo is separate. >> >> Animesh, whats your reason to want to push this out earlier? >> >> --David >> >> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Chip Childers <chipchild...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > Except that the separation only helps if it allows RC testing + voting >> > during doc finalization. If we announce before docs, it hurts us. >> > I'm against another announcement that goes out with the docs in poor >> > shape. >> > >> > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi >> > <animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: >> >> Unless there are objection to the RC, I would prefer to have it >> released and make the announcement sooner and showcase in collab >> conference. As Chip mentions docs were broken out separately anyway. >> >> >> >> Animesh >> >> >> >> >> >> On 14/11/13 8:12 pm, "Sebastien Goasguen" <run...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>>Anyway we can wait next week to release. >> >>> >> >>>quite a few of us will be together in Amsterdam, we can dedicate a >> >>>hackathon session to 4.2.1 , make sure RN are good, upgrade path >> >>>etcŠthen testŠ. >> >>> >> >>>I'd recommend keeping the vote open until then. >> >>> >> >>>-sebastien >> >>> >> >>> >> >>>On Nov 14, 2013, at 5:57 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath >> >>><radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> Hi, >> >>>> >> >>>> The master has the most up-to-date RN for 4.2.1. >> >>>> >> >>>> From: Abhinandan Prateek >> >>>> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 2:22 PM >> >>>> To: CloudStack Dev >> >>>> Cc: Radhika Puthiyetath >> >>>> Subject: Re: [ASF4.2.1] Release Notes >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> It seems the upgrade section of release notes will require a review, >> >>>>probably followed by a revamp (?). >> >>>> Can we have some volunteers who are familiar with various upgrade >> >>>>paths comment on it ? >> >>>> Me and Radhika will try to consolidate those comments, snippets and >> >>>>fix the RN for 4.2.1. >> >>>> >> >>>> -abhi >> >>>> >> >>>> RN for 4.2.1 = >> >>>>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-docs.git;a=tree;f >> >>>>=re >> >>>>lease-notes;h=8128d62c39236331492f3642914bf97b43ed2670;hb=refs/heads/4 >> >>>>.2 >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>
