Anyone can help in SNMP monitoring design? I have very limit experience with SNMP :-)
Thanks, --Tuna On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Vijay Venkatachalam < vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com> wrote: > Hi Chiradeep, > The monitoring service seems to be collecting statistics using > polling and > triggers actions during threshold breach. This seems to be very > tasking. > Can it be designed to listen for events on threshold breach as > well? > For ex. a configuration "response timeout > 30 ms" on a VIP can be > sent to LB appliance, the LB appliance can intimate the Monitoring > service > when the threshold breach has happened. Basically offloading the > responsibility. > Thanks, > Vijay V. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:07 AM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [Discuss] AutoScaling.next in CloudStack > > > > Hi Tuna, > > > > I boldly diagrammed out what we talked about here: > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/M6YTAg > > > > The idea is to keep the monitoring part separate from the autoscale > decision. > > So, the monitoring can be SNMP/RRD/whatever. > > > > Scale-up using reconfiguration then becomes a mere matter of modifying > the > > autoscale service. > > > > > > On 11/25/13 8:57 AM, "tuna" <ng.t...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >Hi guys, > > > > > >At CCCEU13 I talked about the AutoScale without NetScaler feature > > >working with XenServer & XCP. For anyone don¹t know about this feature, > > >take a look into my slide here: > > >http://www.slideshare.net/tuna20073882/autoscale-without- > > netscalerccceu13. > > > > > >Chiradeep and I had a short talk after the presentation about how to > > >improve the AutoScale feature in future. We agreed that: > > > > > >+ Need to remove Load Balancing feature from AutoScaling. That¹s very > > >simple to do. > > >+ Need to use SNMP for monitoring not only instance-level but also > > >application-level. > > >+ Also, supporting well KVM hypervisor > > > > > >So, I blow up this thread for all of you guys to discuss the way we > > >design that feature, such as: > > >+ technical side, how to integrate effectively SNMP into CLoudStack. > > >Where do we put SNMP monitor components into infrastructure? etc > > >+ user experience, how user configure that feature with SNMP monitoring. > > >I image that user can figure out they need AutoScale for which of > > >following items: application, protocol (tcp, udp), port, bandwidth, > > >disk, cpu and memory also, etc > > >+ How about autoscale action, not just only deploy or destroy VM, we > > >+ need > > >maybe dynamically increase-decrease memory/cpu, nic bandwidth, disk,Š > > > > > >Personally, we should think about a completely autoscaling feature. > > > > > >Cheers, > > > > > >‹Tuna > >