Hi Andrija, Just the start of the VR should be sufficient.
Kind regards, Joris van Lieshout Schuberg Philis Boeingavenue 271 1119 PD Schiphol-Rijk schubergphilis.com +31 20-7506672 +31 6-51428188 On 30/05/14 13:48, "Andrija Panic" <andrija.pa...@gmail.com> wrote: >Hi Joris, > >just to be sure - you want me to capture the log from the moment I reboot >router - or you want me to stop it, then start capturing log, and start it >(and continue capture untill ethnull errors inside VR) ? > >Thanks, > > >On 30 May 2014 13:39, Joris van Lieshout <jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com> >wrote: > >> Hi Andrija, >> >> Thanks for the answers. In deed your situation is different so PV/HVM is >> not the issue. >> >> When reading back the log output you have provided I noted that the VR >> messages log indicates that it's waiting for ethnull to be up. This >>raises >> the question where null was introduced instead of 1. The ACS management >> log output you send was, what I think, later down the road where ACS >>gives >> up trying to wait for the VR to come up. If you would capture the >> job-executor in the management log from startCommand till the exception, >> do you see anywhere a mention of ethnull? You might need to reed into >>the >> DirectAgent executing the startCommand to find a clue. The thing is >>that I >> only have experience with XS based environment so I cannot point you to >> the exact output to look for. On XS, at least, it is >> "[c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-351:ctx-4a51bb9e) Created a >> vif e4c362bd-764b-f651-dc9a-1abd5cb33c43 on 1" >> >> Kind regards, >> Joris van Lieshout >> >> Schuberg Philis >> >> >> >> >> >> On 30/05/14 10:48, "Andrija Panic" <andrija.pa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >Hi Deen, >> >no, in DB there is field "vlan_id" with value "untagged" - that >> >"vlan://untagged" is shown from ACS gui, and is used in API call (or >> >better >> >said commands that are seen in management server logs). >> > >> >Best, >> >Andrija >> > >> > >> >On 30 May 2014 10:37, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> Andrija, >> >> >> >> Do not just assign a second net vlan://500 You have one like that and >> >> you don't want conflicting nets using the same vlan. I am wondering >> >> why 'untagged' comes out as 'vlan://untagged'. I think that is the >> >> bug. Did you find the string 'vlan://untagged' in your db? >> >> >> >> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Andrija Panic >> >><andrija.pa...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi Joris, >> >> > >> >> > thank you for taking time to address this issue :) >> >> > >> >> > So...: >> >> > >> >> > - I'm on KVM (stock CentOS 6.2 patched by Inktank for CEPH >>support), >> >>OS >> >> is >> >> > Centos 6.5, libvirt 1.2.3 compiled. >> >> > - ACS 4.3 having problems, ACS 4.2.1 was fine >> >> > - not XS, so I guess no answers for this part :) >> >> > - guest_os_id is 184 = Debian 7 x64 >> >> > - SVM = systemvm-kvm-4.3 = os type 184 = Debian 7 x64 >> >> > >> >> > This worked previously on 4.2.1 = template was ofcourse >> >>systemvm-kvm-4.2 >> >> - >> >> > but that was also Debian 7 x64 type... so this should not be the >> >>issues >> >> > (guest not supported by host...) >> >> > >> >> > The only thing that might be out of "standard" = all SVMs are on >>CEPH >> >>- >> >> > there are official docs on altering database to make some new >>System >> >> > Offering as default for SSVM and CPVM - what I did, I also have >>done >> >>same >> >> > config in DB, to make VR use another System Offering as default - >> >>which >> >> is >> >> > NOT explained in the docs - you could use "Change Offering..." >>button >> >>on >> >> > exiting, shutdown VR to change it per docs... >> >> > But still this worked all fine on 4.2.1... >> >> > >> >> > - regarding /var/cache/cloud/cmdline the content is folowing at the >> >> moment >> >> > root@r-801-VM:~# cat /var/cache/cloud/cmdline >> >> > vpccidr=10.0.0.0/8 domain=cscloud.internal dns1=8.8.8.8 dns2= >> >> template=domP >> >> > name=r-801-VM eth0ip=169.254.0.75 eth0mask=255.255.0.0 >>type=vpcrouter >> >> > disable_rp_filter=true >> >> > >> >> > Also please note that only eth1 does not have IP info, eth0 >>(control >> >> > 169.xxx) and all other eh2 and up that are used for Tiers get IP >>info >> >> fine. >> >> > I could also manually add IP for eth1 (public NIC) and start ifup >> >>eth1 - >> >> > and it works fine, but adding new IP Port Forwarding etc does not >> >>work... >> >> > >> >> > Daan or somebody said it could be realted to my "Public" network >>(in >> >>the >> >> > Zones, Physical Network, eth1 listing) is NOT tagged >> >>(vlan://untagged)... >> >> > Interestingly the only VR that does work fine is the VR used in >>Shared >> >> > network, but that VR is using IP from Guest IP range (also >>efectively >> >> > public IPs but on vlan 500) >> >> > >> >> > I was instructed to try to change Public IP range from untagged to >> >>vlan >> >> > 500, but I'm not sure how to do this, if there is any way at all >> >>(editing >> >> > "vlan" table and changing to vlan 500 does not work, after >>rebooting >> >>VR >> >> > from ACS gui). >> >> > >> >> > :) >> >> > >> >> > So, not sure what is roughly expected date for 4.4, but right now, >>I'm >> >> > pretty stuck with a big problem of all VPC not operational at >>all... >> >> > >> >> > Thanks, >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On 30 May 2014 08:27, Joris van Lieshout < >> >> jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com> >> >> > wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Hi Andrija, >> >> >> >> >> >> Daan asked me to have a look at this as well. Looking at you >>issue I >> >> >> recall having seen something similar. Back then when upgrading >>4.2.1 >> >>to >> >> >> 4.3 I though it had to do with out own custom build svm template. >> >> >> Let me fire off some questions before explaining what the cause >>was >> >>in >> >> our >> >> >> case. :) >> >> >> >> >> >> - what hypervisor (and version) are you using? >> >> >> - if XS, is the new VR a para-virtualised instance (PV) or >>hardware >> >> >> assisted (HVM)? Do a "xe vm-param-list" on the VR uuid and check >>that >> >> >> param PV-args is set and HVM-boot-policy is unset. >> >> >> - what is the OS type of the VR in ACS (guest_os_id in vm_instance >> >>table >> >> >> and match with table guest_os) >> >> >> - what is the OS type of the SVM template? >> >> >> >> >> >> Now for the explaining. :) >> >> >> In our case the OS type of the new template was not supported on >>the >> >> >> XenServer version we are running. Therefore the VR was started by >>XS >> >>as >> >> a >> >> >> HVM guest. System vms on XS rely on the arguments passed to them >>in >> >>the >> >> >> PV-args param (ends up on the guest in /var/cache/cloud/cmdline >> >>which in >> >> >> turn is used by cloud-early-config) in order to work. cmdline >> >>contains >> >> the >> >> >> NIC configuration information. >> >> >> So, long story short, if a VR gets started as a HVM it will not >>get >> >>the >> >> >> information needed to configure it's NICs. >> >> >> >> >> >> Workaround >> >> >> We corrected the os_type_id in the DB (yes I know editing the DB >>is >> >> >> something you usually don't want but there is no other way in this >> >>case) >> >> >> of the existing VR's and of the systemvmtemplate to something >> >>supported >> >> by >> >> >> XenServer. >> >> >> >> >> >> Kind regards, >> >> >> Joris van Lieshout >> >> >> >> >> >> Schuberg Philis >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 29/05/14 12:18, "Andrija Panic" <andrija.pa...@gmail.com> >>wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >They are 2 traffic types on 1 physical net (that is both tagged >>vlan >> >> 500, >> >> >> >and untagged packets travel over same KVM bridge, and over eth1 >>to >> >> outside >> >> >> >world)... >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >On 29 May 2014 12:04, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Are these two traffic types in one physical net? or two >>physical >> >>nets >> >> >> >> on the same interface (seems wrong). >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi >> >> >> >> <jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> > I don't think editing DB table will work. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > -Jayapal >> >> >> >> > On 29-May-2014, at 2:52 PM, Andrija Panic >> >><andrija.pa...@gmail.com >> >> > >> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> It's like this: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I have public subnet /24. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> half is dedicated for Guest traffic (vlan 500) and the >>second >> >> half is >> >> >> >> >> dedicated to Public traffic/network (no vlan tags, that is >> >> untagged >> >> >> >> packets) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Both vlan500 and untagged packets travel over physical eth1 >> >> >> >>interface on >> >> >> >> >> hypervisors and can reach Internet. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 29 May 2014 11:06, Daan Hoogland >><daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Andrija Panic < >> >> >> >> andrija.pa...@gmail.com> >> >> >> >> >>> wrote: >> >> >> >> >>>> 500 >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> is 500 the vlan of your guestnetwork or your physical >>network? >> >> You >> >> >> >> >>> wouldn't want to have two nets with vlan 500! >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> -- >> >> >> >> >>> Daan >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Andrija Panić >> >> >> >> >> -------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> >> http://admintweets.com >> >> >> >> >> -------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> Daan >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >-- >> >> >> > >> >> >> >Andrija Panić >> >> >> >-------------------------------------- >> >> >> > http://admintweets.com >> >> >> >-------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > >> >> > Andrija Panić >> >> > -------------------------------------- >> >> > http://admintweets.com >> >> > -------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Daan >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> >-- >> > >> >Andrija Panić >> >-------------------------------------- >> > http://admintweets.com >> >-------------------------------------- >> >> > > >-- > >Andrija Panić >-------------------------------------- > http://admintweets.com >--------------------------------------
