Hi Mike, Done that, I have added new FAQ section.
In addition, I have tested that volume can take a snapshot, create volume from that snapshot and attach back to VM normally. Currently I am testing with volume migration. On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Hi Hieu, > > Would you be able to place these questions and answers in your design doc > so that we can more easily track them? > > Thanks! > Mike > > > On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Hieu LE <hieul...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Todd, > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Todd Pigram <t...@toddpigram.com> wrote: > > > > > Hieu, > > > > > > I assume you are using MCS for you golden image? What version of XD? > > Given > > > you are using pooled desktops, have you thought about using a PVS BDM > iso > > > and mount it with in your 1000 VMs? This way you can stagger reboots > via > > > PVS console or Studio. This would require a change to your delivery > > group. > > > > > > > > Sorry but I did not use MCS or XenDesktop in my company :-) > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Mike Tutkowski < > > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > 6) The copy_vhd_from_secondarystorage XenServer plug-in is not used > > when > > > > you're using XenServer + XS62ESP1 + XS62ESP1004. In that case, please > > > refer > > > > to copyTemplateToPrimaryStorage(CopyCommand) method in the > > > > Xenserver625StorageProcessor class. > > > > > > > > > > > Thank Mike, I will take note of that. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Mike Tutkowski < > > > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Other than going through a "for" loop and deploying VM after VM, I > > > don't > > > > > think CloudStack currently supports a bulk-VM-deploy operation. > > > > > > > > > > It would be nice if CS did so at some point in the future; however, > > > that > > > > > is probably a separate proposal from Hieu's. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Amit Das <amit....@cloudbyte.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Hi Hieu, > > > > >> > > > > >> Will it be good to include bulk operation of this feature? In > > > addition, > > > > >> does Xen support parallel execution of these operations ? > > > > >> > > > > >> Regards, > > > > >> Amit > > > > >> *CloudByte Inc.* <http://www.cloudbyte.com/> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Hieu LE <hieul...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> > Mike, Punith, > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Please review "Golden Primary Storage" proposal. [1] > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Thank you. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > [1]: > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Golden+Primary+Storage > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 10:32 PM, Mike Tutkowski < > > > > >> > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > >> >> Daan helped out with this. You should be good to go now. > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Hieu LE <hieul...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > Hi Mike, > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > Could you please give edit/create permission on ASF Jira/Wiki > > > > >> >> confluence ? > > > > >> >> > I can not add a new Wiki page. > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > My Jira ID: hieulq > > > > >> >> > Wiki: hieulq89 > > > > >> >> > Review Board: hieulq > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > Thanks ! > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Mike Tutkowski < > > > > >> >> > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com > > > > >> >> > > wrote: > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > Hi, > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > Yes, please feel free to add a new Wiki page for your > design. > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > Here is a link to applicable design info: > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Design > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > Also, feel free to ask more questions and have me review > your > > > > >> design. > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > Thanks! > > > > >> >> > > Mike > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Hieu LE < > hieul...@gmail.com> > > > > >> wrote: > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > Hi Mike, > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > You are right, performance will be decreased over time > > > because > > > > >> >> writes > > > > >> >> > > IOPS > > > > >> >> > > > will always end up on slower storage pool. > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > In our case, we are using CloudStack integrated in VDI > > > solution > > > > >> to > > > > >> >> > > provived > > > > >> >> > > > pooled VM type[1]. So may be my approach can bring better > > UX > > > > for > > > > >> >> user > > > > >> >> > > with > > > > >> >> > > > lower bootime ... > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > A short change in design are followings > > > > >> >> > > > - VM will be deployed with golden primary storage if > > primary > > > > >> >> storage is > > > > >> >> > > > marked golden and this VM template is also marked as > > golden. > > > > >> >> > > > - Choosing the best deploy destionation for both golden > > > primary > > > > >> >> storage > > > > >> >> > > and > > > > >> >> > > > normal root volume primary storage. Chosen host can also > > > access > > > > >> both > > > > >> >> > > > storage pools. > > > > >> >> > > > - New Xen Server plug-in for modifying VHD parent id. > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > Is there some place for me to submit my design and code. > > Can > > > I > > > > >> >> write a > > > > >> >> > > new > > > > >> >> > > > proposal in CS wiki ? > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > [1]: > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > http://support.citrix.com/proddocs/topic/xendesktop-rho/cds-choose-scheme-type-rho.html > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Mike Tutkowski < > > > > >> >> > > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com > > > > >> >> > > > > wrote: > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > It is an interesting idea. If the constraints you face > at > > > > your > > > > >> >> > company > > > > >> >> > > > can > > > > >> >> > > > > be corrected somewhat by implementing this, then you > > should > > > > go > > > > >> for > > > > >> >> > it. > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > It sounds like writes will be placed on the slower > > storage > > > > >> pool. > > > > >> >> This > > > > >> >> > > > means > > > > >> >> > > > > as you update OS components, those updates will be > placed > > > on > > > > >> the > > > > >> >> > slower > > > > >> >> > > > > storage pool. As such, your performance is likely to > > > somewhat > > > > >> >> > decrease > > > > >> >> > > > over > > > > >> >> > > > > time (as more and more writes end up on the slower > > storage > > > > >> pool). > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > That may be OK for your use case(s), though. > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > You'll have to update the storage-pool orchestration > > logic > > > to > > > > >> take > > > > >> >> > this > > > > >> >> > > > new > > > > >> >> > > > > scheme into account. > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > Also, we'll have to figure out how this ties into > storage > > > > >> tagging > > > > >> >> (if > > > > >> >> > > at > > > > >> >> > > > > all). > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > I'd be happy to review your design and code. > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Hieu LE < > > > hieul...@gmail.com> > > > > >> >> wrote: > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Thanks Mike and Punith for quick reply. > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Both solutions you gave here are absolutely correct. > > But > > > > as I > > > > >> >> > > mentioned > > > > >> >> > > > > in > > > > >> >> > > > > > the first email, I want another better solution for > > > current > > > > >> >> > > > > infrastructure > > > > >> >> > > > > > at my company. > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Creating a high IOPS primary storage using storage > tags > > > is > > > > >> good > > > > >> >> but > > > > >> >> > > it > > > > >> >> > > > > will > > > > >> >> > > > > > be very waste of disk capacity. For example, if I > only > > > have > > > > >> 1TB > > > > >> >> SSD > > > > >> >> > > and > > > > >> >> > > > > > deploy 100 VM from a 100GB template. > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > So I think about a solution where a high IOPS primary > > > > storage > > > > >> >> can > > > > >> >> > > only > > > > >> >> > > > > > store golden image (master image), and a child image > of > > > > this > > > > >> VM > > > > >> >> > will > > > > >> >> > > be > > > > >> >> > > > > > stored in another normal (NFS, ISCSI...) storage. In > > this > > > > >> case, > > > > >> >> > with > > > > >> >> > > > 1TB > > > > >> >> > > > > > SSD Primary Storage I can store as much golden image > > as I > > > > >> need. > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > I have also tested it with 256 GB SSD mounted on Xen > > > Server > > > > >> >> 6.2.0 > > > > >> >> > > with > > > > >> >> > > > > 2TB > > > > >> >> > > > > > local storage 10000RPM, 6TB NFS share storage with > 1GB > > > > >> network. > > > > >> >> The > > > > >> >> > > > IOPS > > > > >> >> > > > > of > > > > >> >> > > > > > VMs which have golden image (master image) in SSD and > > > child > > > > >> >> image > > > > >> >> > in > > > > >> >> > > > NFS > > > > >> >> > > > > > increate more than 30-40% compare with VMs which have > > > both > > > > >> >> golden > > > > >> >> > > image > > > > >> >> > > > > and > > > > >> >> > > > > > child image in NFS. The boot time of each VM is also > > > > >> decrease. > > > > >> >> > > ('cause > > > > >> >> > > > > > golden image in SSD only reduced READ IOPS). > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Do you think this approach OK ? > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Mike Tutkowski < > > > > >> >> > > > > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > Thanks, Punith - this is similar to what I was > going > > to > > > > >> say. > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > Any time a set of CloudStack volumes share IOPS > from > > a > > > > >> common > > > > >> >> > pool, > > > > >> >> > > > you > > > > >> >> > > > > > > cannot guarantee IOPS to a given CloudStack volume > > at a > > > > >> given > > > > >> >> > time. > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > Your choices at present are: > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > 1) Use managed storage (where you can create a 1:1 > > > > mapping > > > > >> >> > between > > > > >> >> > > a > > > > >> >> > > > > > > CloudStack volume and a volume on a storage system > > that > > > > has > > > > >> >> QoS). > > > > >> >> > > As > > > > >> >> > > > > > Punith > > > > >> >> > > > > > > mentioned, this requires that you purchase storage > > > from a > > > > >> >> vendor > > > > >> >> > > who > > > > >> >> > > > > > > provides guaranteed QoS on a volume-by-volume bases > > AND > > > > has > > > > >> >> this > > > > >> >> > > > > > integrated > > > > >> >> > > > > > > into CloudStack. > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > 2) Create primary storage in CloudStack that is not > > > > >> managed, > > > > >> >> but > > > > >> >> > > has > > > > >> >> > > > a > > > > >> >> > > > > > high > > > > >> >> > > > > > > number of IOPS (ex. using SSDs). You can then > storage > > > tag > > > > >> this > > > > >> >> > > > primary > > > > >> >> > > > > > > storage and create Compute and Disk Offerings that > > use > > > > this > > > > >> >> > storage > > > > >> >> > > > tag > > > > >> >> > > > > > to > > > > >> >> > > > > > > make sure their volumes end up on this storage pool > > > > >> (primary > > > > >> >> > > > storage). > > > > >> >> > > > > > This > > > > >> >> > > > > > > will still not guarantee IOPS on a CloudStack > > > > >> volume-by-volume > > > > >> >> > > basis, > > > > >> >> > > > > but > > > > >> >> > > > > > > it will at least place the CloudStack volumes that > > > need a > > > > >> >> better > > > > >> >> > > > chance > > > > >> >> > > > > > of > > > > >> >> > > > > > > getting higher IOPS on a storage pool that could > > > provide > > > > >> the > > > > >> >> > > > necessary > > > > >> >> > > > > > > IOPS. A big downside here is that you want to watch > > how > > > > >> many > > > > >> >> > > > CloudStack > > > > >> >> > > > > > > volumes get deployed on this primary storage > because > > > > you'll > > > > >> >> need > > > > >> >> > to > > > > >> >> > > > > > > essentially over-provision IOPS in this primary > > storage > > > > to > > > > >> >> > increase > > > > >> >> > > > the > > > > >> >> > > > > > > probability that each and every CloudStack volume > > that > > > > uses > > > > >> >> this > > > > >> >> > > > > primary > > > > >> >> > > > > > > storage gets the necessary IOPS (and isn't as > likely > > to > > > > >> suffer > > > > >> >> > from > > > > >> >> > > > the > > > > >> >> > > > > > > Noisy Neighbor Effect). You should be able to tell > > > > >> CloudStack > > > > >> >> to > > > > >> >> > > only > > > > >> >> > > > > > use, > > > > >> >> > > > > > > say, 80% (or whatever) of the storage you're > > providing > > > to > > > > >> it > > > > >> >> (so > > > > >> >> > as > > > > >> >> > > > to > > > > >> >> > > > > > > increase your effective IOPS per GB ratio). This > > > > >> >> > over-provisioning > > > > >> >> > > of > > > > >> >> > > > > > IOPS > > > > >> >> > > > > > > to control Noisy Neighbors is avoided in option 1. > In > > > > that > > > > >> >> > > situation, > > > > >> >> > > > > you > > > > >> >> > > > > > > only provision the IOPS and capacity you actually > > need. > > > > It > > > > >> is > > > > >> >> a > > > > >> >> > > much > > > > >> >> > > > > more > > > > >> >> > > > > > > sophisticated approach. > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > >> >> > > > > > > Mike > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Punith S < > > > > >> >> > punit...@cloudbyte.com> > > > > >> >> > > > > > wrote: > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > hi hieu, > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > your problem is the bottle neck we see as a > storage > > > > >> vendors > > > > >> >> in > > > > >> >> > > the > > > > >> >> > > > > > cloud, > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > meaning all the vms in the cloud have not been > > > > guaranteed > > > > >> >> iops > > > > >> >> > > from > > > > >> >> > > > > the > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > primary storage, because in your case i'm > assuming > > > you > > > > >> are > > > > >> >> > > running > > > > >> >> > > > > > > 1000vms > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > on a xen cluster whose all vm's disks are lying > on > > a > > > > same > > > > >> >> > primary > > > > >> >> > > > nfs > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > storage mounted to the cluster, > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > hence you won't get the dedicated iops for each > vm > > > > since > > > > >> >> every > > > > >> >> > vm > > > > >> >> > > > is > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > sharing the same storage. to solve this issue in > > > > >> cloudstack > > > > >> >> we > > > > >> >> > > the > > > > >> >> > > > > > third > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > party vendors have implemented the plugin(namely > > > > >> cloudbyte , > > > > >> >> > > > > solidfire > > > > >> >> > > > > > > etc) > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > to support managed storage(dedicated volumes with > > > > >> guaranteed > > > > >> >> > qos > > > > >> >> > > > for > > > > >> >> > > > > > each > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > vms) , where we are mapping each root disk(vdi) > or > > > data > > > > >> disk > > > > >> >> > of a > > > > >> >> > > > vm > > > > >> >> > > > > > with > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > one nfs or iscsi share coming out of a pool, also > > we > > > > are > > > > >> >> > > proposing > > > > >> >> > > > > the > > > > >> >> > > > > > > new > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > feature to change volume iops on fly in 4.5, > where > > > you > > > > >> can > > > > >> >> > > increase > > > > >> >> > > > > or > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > decrease your root disk iops while booting or at > > peak > > > > >> times. > > > > >> >> > but > > > > >> >> > > to > > > > >> >> > > > > use > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > this plugin you have to buy our storage solution. > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > if not , you can try creating a nfs share out of > > ssd > > > > pool > > > > >> >> > storage > > > > >> >> > > > and > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > create a primary storage in cloudstack out of it > > > named > > > > as > > > > >> >> > golden > > > > >> >> > > > > > primary > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > storage with specific tag like gold, and create a > > > > compute > > > > >> >> > > offering > > > > >> >> > > > > for > > > > >> >> > > > > > > your > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > template with the storage tag as gold, hence all > > the > > > > vm's > > > > >> >> you > > > > >> >> > > > create > > > > >> >> > > > > > will > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > sit on this gold primary storage with high iops. > > and > > > > >> other > > > > >> >> data > > > > >> >> > > > disks > > > > >> >> > > > > > on > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > other primary storage but still here you cannot > > > > guarantee > > > > >> >> the > > > > >> >> > qos > > > > >> >> > > > at > > > > >> >> > > > > vm > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > level. > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > thanks > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Hieu LE < > > > > >> >> hieul...@gmail.com> > > > > >> >> > > > wrote: > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> Hi all, > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> There are some problems while deploying a large > > > amount > > > > >> of > > > > >> >> VMs > > > > >> >> > in > > > > >> >> > > > my > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> company > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> with CloudStack. All VMs are deployed from same > > > > template > > > > >> >> (e.g: > > > > >> >> > > > > Windows > > > > >> >> > > > > > > 7) > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> and the quantity is approximately ~1000VMs. The > > > > problems > > > > >> >> here > > > > >> >> > is > > > > >> >> > > > low > > > > >> >> > > > > > > IOPS, > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> low performance of VM (about ~10-11 IOPS, boot > > time > > > is > > > > >> very > > > > >> >> > > high). > > > > >> >> > > > > The > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> storage of my company is SAN/NAS with NFS and > Xen > > > > Server > > > > >> >> > 6.2.0. > > > > >> >> > > > All > > > > >> >> > > > > > Xen > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> Server nodes have standard server HDD disk raid. > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> I have found some solutions for this such as: > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> - Enable Xen Server Intellicache and some > > tweaks > > > in > > > > >> >> > > CloudStack > > > > >> >> > > > > > codes > > > > >> >> > > > > > > to > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> deploy and start VM in Intellicache mode. But > > > this > > > > >> >> solution > > > > >> >> > > > will > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> transfer > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> all IOPS from shared storage to all local > > > storage, > > > > >> hence > > > > >> >> > > affect > > > > >> >> > > > > and > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> limit > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> some CloudStack features. > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> - Buying some expensive storage solutions and > > > > >> network to > > > > >> >> > > > increase > > > > >> >> > > > > > > IOPS. > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> Nah.. > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> So, I am thinking about a new feature that (may > > be) > > > > >> >> increasing > > > > >> >> > > > IOPS > > > > >> >> > > > > > and > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> performance of VMs: > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> 1. Separate golden image in high IOPS > > partition: > > > > >> buying > > > > >> >> new > > > > >> >> > > > SSD, > > > > >> >> > > > > > plug > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> in > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> Xen Server and deployed a new VM in NFS > storage > > > > WITH > > > > >> >> golden > > > > >> >> > > > image > > > > >> >> > > > > > in > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> this > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> new SSD partition. This can reduce READ IOPS > in > > > > >> shared > > > > >> >> > > storage > > > > >> >> > > > > and > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> decrease > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> boot time of VM. (Currenty, VM deployed in > Xen > > > > Server > > > > >> >> > always > > > > >> >> > > > > have a > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> master > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> image (golden image - in VMWare) always in > the > > > same > > > > >> >> storage > > > > >> >> > > > > > > repository > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> with > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> different image (child image)). We can do > this > > > > trick > > > > >> by > > > > >> >> > > > tweaking > > > > >> >> > > > > in > > > > >> >> > > > > > > VHD > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> header file with new Xen Server plug-in. > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> 2. Create golden primary storage and VM > > template > > > > that > > > > >> >> > enable > > > > >> >> > > > this > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> feature. > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> 3. So, all VMs deployed from template that > had > > > > >> enabled > > > > >> >> this > > > > >> >> > > > > feature > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> will > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> have a golden image stored in golden primary > > > > storage > > > > >> >> (SSD > > > > >> >> > or > > > > >> >> > > > some > > > > >> >> > > > > > > high > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> IOPS > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> partition), and different image (child image) > > > > stored > > > > >> in > > > > >> >> > other > > > > >> >> > > > > > normal > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> primary storage. > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> This new feature will not transfer all IOPS from > > > > shared > > > > >> >> > storage > > > > >> >> > > to > > > > >> >> > > > > > local > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> storage (because high IOPS partition can be > > another > > > > high > > > > >> >> IOPS > > > > >> >> > > > shared > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> storage) and require less money than buying new > > > > storage > > > > >> >> > > solution. > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> What do you think ? If possible, may I write a > > > > proposal > > > > >> in > > > > >> >> > > > > CloudStack > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> wiki ? > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> BRs. > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> Hieu Lee > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> -- > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> Version: 3.1 > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> GCS/CM/IT/M/MU d-@? s+(++):+(++) !a > C++++(++++)$ > > > > >> >> > ULC++++(++)$ P > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> L++(+++)$ E > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> !W N* o+ K w O- M V- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+ t 5 X R > tv+ > > > > >> >> b+(++)>+++ > > > > >> >> > DI- > > > > >> >> > > > D+ > > > > >> >> > > > > G > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> e++(+++) h-- r(++)>+++ y- > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > -- > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > regards, > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > punith s > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > cloudbyte.com > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > -- > > > > >> >> > > > > > > *Mike Tutkowski* > > > > >> >> > > > > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* > > > > >> >> > > > > > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com > > > > >> >> > > > > > > o: 303.746.7302 > > > > >> >> > > > > > > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud > > > > >> >> > > > > > > < > http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play > > > >*™* > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > -- > > > > >> >> > > > > > -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- > > > > >> >> > > > > > Version: 3.1 > > > > >> >> > > > > > GCS/CM/IT/M/MU d-@? s+(++):+(++) !a C++++(++++)$ > > > > >> ULC++++(++)$ P > > > > >> >> > > > > L++(+++)$ > > > > >> >> > > > > > E > > > > >> >> > > > > > !W N* o+ K w O- M V- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+ t 5 X R tv+ > > > > b+(++)>+++ > > > > >> DI- > > > > >> >> > D+ G > > > > >> >> > > > > > e++(+++) h-- r(++)>+++ y- > > > > >> >> > > > > > ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > -- > > > > >> >> > > > > *Mike Tutkowski* > > > > >> >> > > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* > > > > >> >> > > > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com > > > > >> >> > > > > o: 303.746.7302 > > > > >> >> > > > > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud > > > > >> >> > > > > <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play > >*™* > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > -- > > > > >> >> > > > -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- > > > > >> >> > > > Version: 3.1 > > > > >> >> > > > GCS/CM/IT/M/MU d-@? s+(++):+(++) !a C++++(++++)$ > > > ULC++++(++)$ > > > > P > > > > >> >> > > L++(+++)$ > > > > >> >> > > > E > > > > >> >> > > > !W N* o+ K w O- M V- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+ t 5 X R tv+ > > b+(++)>+++ > > > > DI- > > > > >> D+ > > > > >> >> G > > > > >> >> > > > e++(+++) h-- r(++)>+++ y- > > > > >> >> > > > ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > -- > > > > >> >> > > *Mike Tutkowski* > > > > >> >> > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* > > > > >> >> > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com > > > > >> >> > > o: 303.746.7302 > > > > >> >> > > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud > > > > >> >> > > <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™* > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > -- > > > > >> >> > -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- > > > > >> >> > Version: 3.1 > > > > >> >> > GCS/CM/IT/M/MU d-@? s+(++):+(++) !a C++++(++++)$ > ULC++++(++)$ > > P > > > > >> >> L++(+++)$ > > > > >> >> > E > > > > >> >> > !W N* o+ K w O- M V- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+ t 5 X R tv+ b+(++)>+++ > > DI- > > > > D+ G > > > > >> >> > e++(+++) h-- r(++)>+++ y- > > > > >> >> > ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> -- > > > > >> >> *Mike Tutkowski* > > > > >> >> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* > > > > >> >> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com > > > > >> >> o: 303.746.7302 > > > > >> >> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud > > > > >> >> <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™* > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > -- > > > > >> > -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- > > > > >> > Version: 3.1 > > > > >> > GCS/CM/IT/M/MU d-@? s+(++):+(++) !a C++++(++++)$ ULC++++(++)$ P > > > > >> L++(+++)$ > > > > >> > E !W N* o+ K w O- M V- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+ t 5 X R tv+ b+(++)>+++ > DI- > > > D+ > > > > G > > > > >> > e++(+++) h-- r(++)>+++ y- > > > > >> > ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > *Mike Tutkowski* > > > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* > > > > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com > > > > > o: 303.746.7302 > > > > > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud > > > > > <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > *Mike Tutkowski* > > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* > > > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com > > > > o: 303.746.7302 > > > > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud > > > > <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > Todd Pigram > > > http://about.me/ToddPigram > > > www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/ > > > @pigram86 on twitter > > > https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86 > > > Mobile - 216-224-5769 > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- > > Version: 3.1 > > GCS/CM/IT/M/MU d-@? s+(++):+(++) !a C++++(++++)$ ULC++++(++)$ P > L++(+++)$ > > E > > !W N* o+ K w O- M V- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+ t 5 X R tv+ b+(++)>+++ DI- D+ G > > e++(+++) h-- r(++)>+++ y- > > ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ > > > > > > -- > *Mike Tutkowski* > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com > o: 303.746.7302 > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud > <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™* > -- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GCS/CM/IT/M/MU d-@? s+(++):+(++) !a C++++(++++)$ ULC++++(++)$ P L++(+++)$ E !W N* o+ K w O- M V- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+ t 5 X R tv+ b+(++)>+++ DI- D+ G e++(+++) h-- r(++)>+++ y- ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
