If force push is disabled, feature branches wont be able to rebase on master directly unless they create a temp branch or do a merge.[1]
Moving tags aren't recommended. see discussion on "Re-tagging" in git-tag man page [2] [1] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8939977/git-push-rejected-after-feature-branch-rebase [2] https://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-tag.html ~Rajani On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > > On 01-Sep-2014, at 9:55 am, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I worry that disabling force push will inhibit moving tags and deleting > > branches, two thing I definately want to keep on doing. > > I’ve worked on git hooks before, and you can still be able to delete tags > and branches if we were to disable force pushes. This is technically > possible. > > > > > > > > On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 3:15 AM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: > > > >> Projects do not have the ability to specify their own hooks. You > >> essentially get the same set as every other project in the Foundation > >> using git. The reasons behind this are that essentially projects would > >> have an incredibly divergent set of hooks, they would be > >> unmaintainable long term. Infra has had experiences in the past where > >> commit (or pre-commit) hooks were configurable and ended up causing > >> massive performance impacts; and were incredibly difficult to trace > >> down. > >> > >> Most hook functionality (though not in the case) can be accomplished > >> with gitpubsub, which is what a majority of folks do who want > >> hook-like functionality. > >> > >> You can ask/make the recommendation that the foundation disable force > >> pushes across all branches of all repositories at the foundation. That > >> may actually make a lot of sense. But I don't know that everyone will > >> agree. (I tend to concur, I can't think of a good reason one would do > >> a force push). > >> > >> --David > >> > >> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com > > > >> wrote: > >>> Hi David, > >>> > >>> On 29-Aug-2014, at 6:59 pm, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: > >>>> force pushes on master are already prohibited. > >>>> The other branches allow that though. > >>> > >>> We already know this. The discussion is; > >>> > >>> 1. Should we put git hooks to prevent force pushes on all branches? > >> (people would be still able to delete any remote branches though, which > is > >> another issue IMO that you can delete any remote branch other than > master) > >>> > >>> 2. Any reason we should not do that, for example if anyone has a good > >> reason to use force push? > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Rohit Yadav > >>> Software Architect, ShapeBlue > >>> M. +41 779015219 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com > >>> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related > >> services > >>> > >>> IaaS Cloud Design & Build< > >> http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//> > >>> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework< > http://shapeblue.com/csforge/> > >>> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/> > >>> CloudStack Infrastructure Support< > >> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/> > >>> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses< > >> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/> > >>> > >>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are > >> intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. > Any > >> views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not > >> necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If > you > >> are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any > >> action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please > >> contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. > >> Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue > >> Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated > under > >> license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a > >> company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape > >> Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic > of > >> South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue > is > >> a registered trademark. > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Daan > > Regards, > Rohit Yadav > Software Architect, ShapeBlue > M. +41 779015219 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com > Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab > > > > Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services > > IaaS Cloud Design & Build< > http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//> > CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/> > CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/> > CloudStack Infrastructure Support< > http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/> > CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses< > http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/> > > This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended > solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or > opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily > represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the > intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based > upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender > if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a > company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a > company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue > Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil > and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is > a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under > license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. >
