Adrian, It should be a db insert. (hope i'm not missing anything) On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Adrian Lewis <adr...@alsiconsulting.co.uk> wrote:
> Out of interest, on the assumption that there are no issues with using 6.5 > when it's released and there are no backwards-compatibility problems, will > it then work with 4.4.1 or does CS need to be *explicitly* told that newer, > effectively unknown versions are 'acceptable' as a valid hypervisor? > Basically, If we deploy CS 4.4.1 and we like the look of XS 6.5 when it > comes out, will we need to make any changes to CS to start using it? If so, > are these simple edits to the contents of a file or would it require > rebuilding? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen Turner [mailto:stephen.tur...@citrix.com] > Sent: 20 October 2014 15:28 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: xenserver 6.5 > > I think it should be minimal, because although there are large internal > changes (e.g., 3.x kernel, 64-bit dom0, new Xen, new storage datapath, > PVHVM > mode for RHEL/CentOS 7), the interface is essentially unchanged. > > -- > Stephen Turner > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] > Sent: 20 October 2014 14:32 > To: dev > Subject: xenserver 6.5 > > Does anybody (know of) work on supporting xenserver 6.5 or has an idea of > how much effort that is going to be? > > -- > Daan > -- Daan
