Daan,

Here are the relevant commits:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=2be02d1f515d8d089b6596127614fe6b8030d723
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=b7f5e95c8f17cf42d35705872b4210db8c2def72
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=674af6e47313fa18c18536a2daed90d13b9a9a59

Mike,

Here's an example of the type of DB changes:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blobdiff;f=setup/db/db/schema-441to450.sql;h=e6aae8e3d624744af9f19b132fa8f53b5a4cddb5;hp=34d5f8842005f8a2da4df8a9a838d919cc648831;hb=2be02d1f515d8d089b6596127614fe6b8030d723;hpb=f212aa57c32eb05d6a69730e37ac50bdb1f0a268

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:

> Yeah, Tim, I'm a little unclear of what you mean by requiring a DB update.
>
> Can you clarify that?
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Tim, these changes are needed? so 4.4.1 will not work with db changes...
> Do
> > you have a commit id?
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Tim Mackey <tmac...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I know that master had a bunch of cleanup work to make things work
> better
> > > (commits were a month ago), but baring any significant issues, being
> able
> > > to support a newer XenServer should be as simple as a database update.
> > So
> > > net of this master *today* should work fine with 6.5 (and the various
> > > pre-release builds since beta.2).
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Someone correct me if I'm wrong but, if a previous XenServer resource
> > > class
> > > > can handle the newer version of XenServer, then I don't think you
> need
> > to
> > > > make any changes to CloudStack files to use that newer version.
> > > >
> > > > If you do see some incompatibility with that version of XenServer,
> then
> > > > someone would need to create a new resource class to handle the
> > > > discrepancies.
> > > >
> > > > On Monday, October 20, 2014, Adrian Lewis <
> adr...@alsiconsulting.co.uk
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Out of interest, on the assumption that there are no issues with
> > using
> > > > 6.5
> > > > > when it's released and there are no backwards-compatibility
> problems,
> > > > will
> > > > > it then work with 4.4.1 or does CS need to be *explicitly* told
> that
> > > > newer,
> > > > > effectively unknown versions are 'acceptable' as a valid
> hypervisor?
> > > > > Basically, If we deploy CS 4.4.1 and we like the look of XS 6.5
> when
> > it
> > > > > comes out, will we need to make any changes to CS to start using
> it?
> > If
> > > > so,
> > > > > are these simple edits to the contents of a file or would it
> require
> > > > > rebuilding?
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Stephen Turner [mailto:stephen.tur...@citrix.com
> > <javascript:;>]
> > > > > Sent: 20 October 2014 15:28
> > > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>
> > > > > Subject: RE: xenserver 6.5
> > > > >
> > > > > I think it should be minimal, because although there are large
> > internal
> > > > > changes (e.g., 3.x kernel, 64-bit dom0, new Xen, new storage
> > datapath,
> > > > > PVHVM
> > > > > mode for RHEL/CentOS 7), the interface is essentially unchanged.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Stephen Turner
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>]
> > > > > Sent: 20 October 2014 14:32
> > > > > To: dev
> > > > > Subject: xenserver 6.5
> > > > >
> > > > > Does anybody (know of) work on supporting xenserver 6.5 or has an
> > idea
> > > of
> > > > > how much effort that is going to be?
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Daan
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > > > o: 303.746.7302
> > > > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
> > > > <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™*
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Daan
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
> <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™*
>

Reply via email to