I did not see any reactions, are we on for tonight? On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > H, > > This is a question for feedback (fyi == For Your Input;). In the > meetings we had so far, we created a couple of lists. These are our > only deliverables to date. In order to know if we are on the right > track I would like some feedback. > > First of all there is the highlevel requirement [1]. It should contain > everything we want to accomplish in the end. We will revisit it next > Wednesday and in regular iterations while the project goes on. I hope > everybody that won't attend next session will have their comments sent > to us by then. > > Then there are two detail pages that we have come up with so far and > these are not done until there is some form of consensus on them in > the community. Especially [2] is a page that we should all agree on in > the end. Right now it is just a working document that we will use to > implement our own way of working and later propose everybody will. It > describes what we think are the basics of cloudstack as opposed to the > extras that people should support on their own and will be abandoned > if nobody does. > > The third page [3] contains a set of requirements that we think will > make a gate for contributions that is workable for the community. > > please have a look and give us your feedback. > > [1] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Quality+and+Process+Improvement+Initiative > [2] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+basic+functionalities > [3] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Gate+requirements > > > (fyi: we are looking to implement a simple contribution workflow based > on github in combination with jenkins pull request builder for now and > are still considering what would have to be done to implement > something like gerrit.) > > thanks, > -- > Daan
-- Daan
