On Jul 1, 2015, at 9:35 AM, Wilder Rodrigues <wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> 
wrote:

> Nice!
> 
> I spent couple of hours this morning to review a few PRs.
> 
> But we still have too many of them and not many people reviewing/testing, 
> which makes the process a bit slow.
> 

I expect this week to get slow. It's July 4th week end in the US.

And it's a new process.

IMHO there is no problem in being a little slow and having a back log of PRs as 
long as it make releasing faster.

And it will motivate everyone to review.

> From the guys who usually review PRs, who is currently on holidays?
> 
> Cheers,
> Wilder
> 
> 
>> On 29 Jun 2015, at 11:27, sebgoa <run...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Ok we are on,
>> 
>> Starting today, commit to master through PR only.
>> 2 LGTM needed for merge.
>> If Travis fails, we can still merge given a good explanation of why (since 
>> travis has issues once in a while).
>> 
>> I will keep an eye on commit, at least once a day, and ping the list if I 
>> see a commit that went in without a PR.
>> 
>> thanks, let's give this a shot, goal being of course to stabilize master for 
>> 4.6.
>> 
>> Everyone should start testing master as if it were a release branch now.
>> 
>> -sebastien
>> 
>> 
>> On Jun 28, 2015, at 9:17 AM, Remi Bergsma <r...@remi.nl> wrote:
>> 
>>> Let’s do it!
>>> 
>>> Starting tomorrow we’ll commit to master through PR only (as described 
>>> below), and we’ll evaluate this at Sept 30, 2015. 
>>> 
>>> I’ll put a reminder in my schedule to start the thread.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Remi
>>> 
>>>> On 26 jun. 2015, at 23:10, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> date := 2015-09-30 ???
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:54 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.com> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> A few of us are in Amsterdam at DevOps days. We are chatting about 
>>>>>> release management procedure.
>>>>>> Remi is working on a set of principles that he will put on the wiki to 
>>>>>> start a [DISCUSS].
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> However to get started on the right track. I would like to propose the 
>>>>>> following easy step:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Starting Monday June 29th (next monday):
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> - Only commit through PR will land on master (after a minimum of 2 LGTM 
>>>>>> and green Travis results)
>>>>>> - Direct commit will be reverted
>>>>>> - Any committer can merge the PR.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Goal being to start having a new practice -everything through PR for 
>>>>>> everyone- which is an easy way to gate our own commits building up to a 
>>>>>> PR.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> There is no tooling involved, just human agreement.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> cheers,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -Sebastien
>>>>> 
>>>>> In general, +1
>>>>> I think we should set a time, say a month or two out, to review how
>>>>> well it has worked, and what we need to tweak to make things better. I
>>>>> think we should be explicit with this so that we can say 'On $date'
>>>>> we'll start a thread to talk about what has and hasn't worked and how
>>>>> we can improve this.
>>>>> 
>>>>> --David
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Daan
>>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to