> On Jul 9, 2015, at 3:27 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 4:49 AM, Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> > wrote: > >> >> On 09-Jul-2015, at 12:50 pm, Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Let’s revert , that’s our new rule >> >> >> Since we have not voted what/how we are going to do commits, let’s treat >> this more of a guideline or honour code. >> > > > Votes aren't strictly necessary. As a matter of fact, votes should be > avoided if at all possible. We should strive for consensus, and when we > have it, it is as binding as if we had a tally of votes. > > >> >> I’ve expressed few concersn on this rule wrt code reviewing for PRs that >> are not getting attention, so IMO let’s try to have the discussion and find >> solution before we really start enforcing them. >> >> > So my take (FWIW) is that without the pain, we'll never adjust our method > of operation or find the solutions. In example, no one came to the list > asking for reviews. >
+1 > --David
