Heaven is closer than you might think. 4.7 did not require a systemvm template change, so we reused the existing one. No impact in upgrading. We need to change it only when needed, it’s that simple.
A separate project and version is probably best way forward. Regards, Remi On 07/01/16 15:50, "Wido den Hollander" <w...@widodh.nl> wrote: > > >On 01/07/2016 03:47 PM, Nux! wrote: >>> And that is indeed it. I'm not keen on doing point releases either. >> >>> Simplify upgrade paths, ditch the fact that a VR has to be upgraded >>> every time, etc, etc. >> >> That'd be heaven. I hate the VR upgrades! >> > >A version might have a flag telling if the VR needs upgrade or not. >Boolean, true/false. > >>> >>> We could also call 4.8 simply 4.7.2. It's just a number :) >> >> +1, perhaps switch to version based on dates? >> > >No, my point is. Just the fact that it is called 4.8 makes people itchy. >I really wonder why. > >We could also call it 5.0 and that will keep people away from it? > >Wido > >>> >>> Wido >> >>
