Hi,

The system VMs are just running on local storage.

Thanks,
Mike

> On Apr 15, 2016, at 12:49 AM, Anshul Gangwar <anshul.gang...@accelerite.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Mike, what type of storage are you using?
> 
> 
>> On 15-Apr-2016, at 9:49 AM, Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> I'm not sure, Daan.
>> 
>> I plan to keep an eye on this behavior for a while when creating new clouds.
>> 
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 2:12 AM
>> To: dev
>> Subject: Re: Strange XenServer SR behavior when deploying system VMs in 
>> Basic Zone on 4.9
>> 
>> Mike, did the iso copy process not complete as expected. Sound like they
>> are a remanence of some task ending in an exception. Probably a silently
>> ignored one ;|
>> 
>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Just an FYI, but when I kicked off my first VM in this cloud, the VR
>>> happened to get deployed to XenServer-6.5-3 (which was one of my XenServer
>>> hosts that had an un-expected shared SR pointing at secondary storage
>>> beforehand).
>>> 
>>> Once the process of copying the system template down to local storage
>>> completed, the shared SR pointing at secondary storage went away (as you
>>> would expect).
>>> 
>>> This leaves me now with one un-expected shared SR pointing at secondary
>>> storage on XenServer-6.5-1.
>>> 
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 5:10 PM
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Subject: Strange XenServer SR behavior when deploying system VMs in Basic
>>> Zone on 4.9
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Has anyone recently observed the following behavior:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> http://imgur.com/8ALJmWb
>>> 
>>> 
>>> As you can see in the image, I have three 6.5 XenServer hosts in a
>>> resource pool.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I just used them when creating a basic zone and the system VMs were
>>> deployed just fine. However, there are SRs pointing to secondary storage on
>>> my XenServer-6.5-1 and XenServer-6.5-3 hosts still (there used to be one on
>>> my XenServer-6.5-2 host, but it went away once the system VMs started up on
>>> that host).
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thoughts?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Mike
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Daan
> 
> 
> 
> 
> DISCLAIMER
> ==========
> This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is the 
> property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is intended only 
> for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are 
> not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, 
> print, distribute or use this message. If you have received this 
> communication in error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of 
> this message. Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business does not accept any 
> liability for virus infected mails.

Reply via email to