Hi Will and Team

Can someone point me to upgrade instructions if such exist.

Would like to avoid learning through trial and error if possible.

I will be testing upgrade and functionality of KVM & VMware Advanced
Shared Zones from ACS4.5.2 to latest.

Thanks
ilya

On 7/29/16 11:06 AM, ilya wrote:
> Hi Will
> 
> What Remi mentioned sounds reasonable..
> 
> I'll be spending sometime today and next week to test out the issue
> reported in 4.8 with VR not starting in Basic Zone - as well latest 4.9..
> 
> i know i'm late to the party - but this is the best i could do :(
> 
> Regards,
> ilya
> 
> 
> 
> On 7/29/16 9:19 AM, Will Stevens wrote:
>> I think everything is up to date and correct now.  Please let me know if
>> anything seems out of place (this is the first time I have done this).
>>
>> I will wait to do an official announcement until Monday in case anything
>> comes up.  I will also wait to update the following things until Monday:
>> http://cloudstack.apache.org/downloads.html and the release notes (cause I
>> have to finish them).
>>
>> Let me know if you have questions.
>>
>> Should I be cutting a 4.8.1 release as well?  Not sure how that works.
>> Remi said to do the 4.9.0 release first and then take care of the 4.8.1
>> release after.  Ideas?
>>
>> *Will STEVENS*
>> Lead Developer
>>
>> *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
>> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
>> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Yep, in the process of getting the release cut.  Got side tracked by
>>> people a few times, but I am almost finished...  I will keep you posted...
>>>
>>> *Will STEVENS*
>>> Lead Developer
>>>
>>> *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
>>> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
>>> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thank you Will. Please cut the 4.9 branch so it can be picked for LTS
>>>> release work.
>>>>
>>>> I'll publish the rpm/deb packages in the sb hosted upstream repo shortly.
>>>>
>>>> Regards.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
>>>> www.shapeblue.com
>>>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
>>>> @shapeblue
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 7:27 PM +0530, "Will Stevens" <
>>>> wstev...@cloudops.com<mailto:wstev...@cloudops.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, I did not follow the correct format.  :P
>>>>
>>>> After 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.9.0 *passes* with 6 PMC + 2
>>>> non-PMC votes.
>>>>
>>>> +1 (PMC / binding)
>>>> * Rohit Yadav
>>>> * Mike Tutkowski
>>>> * Wido den Hollander
>>>> * Milamber
>>>> * Nux!
>>>> * John Burwell
>>>>
>>>> +1 (non binding)
>>>> * Paul Angus
>>>> * Abhinandan Prateek
>>>>
>>>> 0
>>>> none
>>>>
>>>> -1
>>>> none
>>>>
>>>> Thanks to everyone participating.
>>>>
>>>> *Will STEVENS*
>>>> Lead Developer
>>>>
>>>> *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
>>>> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
>>>> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The vote is closed.  The RC passed with the following votes.
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 : 8 (including 6 binding)
>>>>> +0 : 0
>>>>> -1 : 0
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks everyone, I will get this pushed out today...
>>>>>
>>>>> *Will STEVENS*
>>>>> Lead Developer
>>>>>
>>>>> *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
>>>>> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
>>>>> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Abhinandan Prateek <
>>>>> abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Did manual testing with a cluster of Xen 6.5 in advanced zone.
>>>>>> Vm life cycle
>>>>>> VM Snapshot, volume snapshots
>>>>>> Volume and Template from snapshots
>>>>>> Migration
>>>>>> Change Password
>>>>>> Change service offering
>>>>>> VPC, multiple tiers, VMs, ACLs
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> -abhi
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 29/07/16, 1:43 AM, "John Burwell" <john.burw...@shapeblue.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I vote +1 (binding).  We have tested 4.9.0 RC2 in the following
>>>>>> environments:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       • CentOS 6.8 management server + CentOS 6.8 KVM Hosts using NFS
>>>>>> primary and secondary storage (would allow us to verify/fix the
>>>> documented
>>>>>> libvirt/qemu versions)
>>>>>>>       • CentOS 6.8 management server + vCenter 5.5u3d + ESXi 5.5u3b
>>>>>> using NFS primary and secondary storage
>>>>>>>       • CentOS 6.8 management server + vCenter 6.0u2 + ESXi Express
>>>>>> Patch 6 using NFS primary and secondary storage
>>>>>>>       • CentOS 6.8 management server + XenServer 6.2 SP1 using NFS
>>>>>> primary and secondary storage
>>>>>>>       • CentOS 6.8 management server + XenServer 6.5 SP1 using NFS
>>>>>> primary and secondary storage
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For each environment, we have run the following tests:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       • All smoke tests
>>>>>>>       • test_accounts.py
>>>>>>>       • test_acl_*.py
>>>>>>>       • test_sharednetwork*.py
>>>>>>>       • test_add_remove_network.py
>>>>>>>       • test_advancedsg_networks.py
>>>>>>>       • test_affinity_groups*.py
>>>>>>>       • test_cpu_domain_limits.py
>>>>>>>       • test_cpu_limits.py
>>>>>>>       • test_cpu_max_limits.py
>>>>>>>       • test_host_maintenance.py
>>>>>>>       • test_memory_limits.py
>>>>>>>       • test_network_offering.py
>>>>>>>       • test_overcommit.py
>>>>>>>       • test_persistent_networks.py
>>>>>>>       • test_ps_domain_limits.py
>>>>>>>       • test_ps_limits.py
>>>>>>>       • test_ps_max_limits.py
>>>>>>>       • test_ps_resize_volume.py
>>>>>>>       • test_ps_resource_limits_volume.py
>>>>>>>       • test_resource_limits.py
>>>>>>>       • test_routers.py
>>>>>>>       • test_security_groups.py
>>>>>>>       • test_shared_networks.py
>>>>>>>       • test_snapshots.py
>>>>>>>       • test_ss_domain_limits.py
>>>>>>>       • test_ss_limits.py
>>>>>>>       • test_ss_max_limits.py
>>>>>>>       • test_templates.py
>>>>>>>       • test_update_vm.py
>>>>>>>       • test_volumes.py
>>>>>>>       • test_vpc.py
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> During our tests, we found the following issues, but do not see any of
>>>>>> them as blockers:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       • As Paul and Boris noted, the
>>>>>> test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL in
>>>>>> test_vpc_redundant.py fails.  We are uncertain as to whether this
>>>> failure
>>>>>> is caused by a defect, a problem with the test case, or our test
>>>>>> environment.
>>>>>>>       • We have seen NPEs in the log every 10 minutes attempting to
>>>>>> garbage collect a non-existent XenServer volume previously attached to
>>>> a
>>>>>> VR.  While ugly, it is not leaving unused volumes to consume disk
>>>> space.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> -John
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> john.burw...@shapeblue.com
>>>>>>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
>>>>>>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London VA WC2N 4HSUK
>>>>>>> @shapeblue
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jul 28, 2016, at 12:55 PM, Paul Angus <paul.an...@shapeblue.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm getting a pass on KVM for
>>>>>> /marvin/test/integration/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py
>>>>>>>> And a FAIL on VMware for the same test, with the same error.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2016-07-28 04:00:52,133 - CRITICAL - FAILED:
>>>>>> test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL: ['Traceback
>>>> (most
>>>>>> recent call last):\n', '  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/unittest/case.py",
>>>>>> line 369, in run\n    testMethod()\n', '  File
>>>>>> "/marvin/test/integration/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py", line 537, in
>>>>>> test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL\n
>>>>>> self.check_routers_state(1)\n', '  File
>>>>>> "/marvin/test/integration/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py", line 304, in
>>>>>> check_routers_state\n    self.query_routers(count, showall)\n', '  File
>>>>>> "/marvin/test/integration/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py", line 297, in
>>>>>> query_routers\n    "Check that %s routers were indeed created" %
>>>> count)\n',
>>>>>> '  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/unittest/case.py", line 553, in
>>>>>> assertEqual\n    assertion_func(first, second, msg=msg)\n', '  File
>>>>>> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/unittest/case.py", line 546, in
>>>> _baseAssertEqual\n
>>>>>> raise self.failureException(msg)\n', 'AssertionError: Check that 1
>>>> routers
>>>>>> were indeed created\n']
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Paul Angus
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
>>>>>>>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
>>>>>>>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
>>>>>>>> @shapeblue
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>> From: williamstev...@gmail.com [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] On
>>>>>> Behalf Of Will Stevens
>>>>>>>> Sent: 28 July 2016 17:24
>>>>>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The teardown issue looks to be environmental.  Apparently the
>>>> network
>>>>>> did not get cleaned up before the network service offering using it was
>>>>>> attempted to be deleted.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am not sure about the test_vpc_redundent test failure.  I run that
>>>>>> test all the time on KVM and have not been getting that problem.  Do
>>>> you
>>>>>> get the same thing if you run it again in your environment?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Will STEVENS*
>>>>>>>> Lead Developer
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
>>>>>>>> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|*
>>>> tw
>>>>>> @CloudOps_
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Boris Stoyanov <
>>>>>> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi we’ve run: test_vpc_redundant and got :
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2016-07-28 16:36:29,959 - CRITICAL - FAILED:
>>>> test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers:
>>>>>>>>> ['Traceback (most recent call last):\n', '  File
>>>>>>>>> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/unittest/case.py", line 369, in run\n
>>>>>>>>> testMethod()\n', '  File
>>>>>>>>> "/marvin/test/integration/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py", line 620,
>>>> in
>>>>>>>>> test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers\n    self.check_routers_state()\n', '
>>>> File
>>>>>>>>> "/marvin/test/integration/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py", line 353,
>>>> in
>>>>>>>>> check_routers_state\n    self.fail("Expected \'%s\' routers at
>>>> state
>>>>>>>>> \'%s\', but found \'%s\'!" % (expected_count, status_to_check,
>>>>>>>>> cnts[vals.index(status_to_check)]))\n', '  File
>>>>>>>>> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/unittest/case.py", line 450, in fail\n
>>>> raise
>>>>>>>>> self.failureException(msg)\n', "AssertionError: Expected '1'
>>>> routers
>>>>>>>>> at state 'MASTER', but found '0'!\n"]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Deleting network offering while in use?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2016-07-28 16:38:41,560 - CRITICAL - EXCEPTION:
>>>>>> test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers:
>>>>>>>>> ['Traceback (most recent call last):\n', '  File
>>>>>>>>> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/unittest/case.py", line 398, in run\n
>>>>>>>>> self.tearDown()\n', '  File
>>>>>>>>> "/marvin/test/integration/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py", line 281,
>>>> in
>>>>>>>>> tearDown\n    raise Exception("Warning: Exception during cleanup :
>>>>>> %s" %
>>>>>>>>> e)\n', "Exception: Warning: Exception during cleanup : Execute cmd:
>>>>>>>>> deletenetworkoffering failed, due to: errorCode: 431,
>>>> errorText:Can't
>>>>>>>>> delete network offering 35 as its used by 1 networks. To make the
>>>>>>>>> network offering unavaiable, disable it\n"]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Our setup is centos68 with xen6.2 hosts.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com
>>>>>>>>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
>>>>>>>>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Jul 27, 2016, at 6:20 PM, Haijiao <18602198...@163.com<mailto:
>>>>>>>>> 18602198...@163.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi, Gents
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Anyone tested RC2 with redudant VR configuration ?  I think there
>>>> are
>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>> issues not fixed yet, e.g. password server.
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9385
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We will test these days and come back.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com
>>>>>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
>>>>>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
>>>>>> @shapeblue
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>

Reply via email to