In /var/log/cloud/cloud.out, I see the following repeated over and over again (below).
I'm running version 4.10.0 of the management server (but the implementation version of the agent looks to be 4.9.0). I do have systemvm-4.10.0-SNAPSHOT.iso accessible at /export/secondary/systemvm (/export/secondary is my one and only secondary storage at the time being). 2016-08-18 14:03:43,633 INFO [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) Agent started 2016-08-18 14:03:43,637 INFO [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) Implementation Version is 4.9.0 2016-08-18 14:03:43,637 INFO [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) agent.properties found at /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/conf/agent.properties 2016-08-18 14:03:43,643 DEBUG [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) Found property: instance 2016-08-18 14:03:43,643 DEBUG [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) Found property: resource 2016-08-18 14:03:43,643 INFO [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) Defaulting to using properties file for storage 2016-08-18 14:03:43,645 INFO [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) Defaulting to the constant time backoff algorithm 2016-08-18 14:03:43,666 INFO [cloud.utils.LogUtils] (main:null) log4j configuration found at /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/conf/log4j-cloud.xml 2016-08-18 14:03:43,686 INFO [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) Using default Java settings for IPv6 preference for agent connection 2016-08-18 14:03:43,687 DEBUG [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) Checking to see if agent.SecStorage.pid exists. 2016-08-18 14:03:43,694 DEBUG [cloud.utils.ProcessUtil] (main:null) environment.properties could not be opened 2016-08-18 14:03:43,703 DEBUG [cloud.utils.ProcessUtil] (main:null) Executing: bash -c echo $PPID 2016-08-18 14:03:43,711 DEBUG [cloud.utils.ProcessUtil] (main:null) Execution is successful. 2016-08-18 14:03:43,726 ERROR [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) Unable to start agent: Resource class not found: com.cloud.storage.resource.PremiumSecondaryStorageResource due to: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: com.cloud.storage.resource.PremiumSecondaryStorageResource ________________________________________ From: Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 7:54 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Issue with SSVM on KVM on master Thanks for the comments, Simon. I went ahead and tried to telnet into 8250 on my management server (first from the SSVM and then from another machine). In both cases, this was the result: telnet 192.168.129.50 8250 Trying 192.168.129.50... Connected to 192.168.129.50. Escape character is '^]'. Connection closed by foreign host. It looks like a connection was established, but then shortly after closed. Is this what you were expecting might happen? ________________________________________ From: Simon Weller <swel...@ena.com> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 6:39 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Issue with SSVM on KVM on master Mike, I wonder whether this could be related to the NIO connection improvements. We saw this type of problem quite a bit when we were testing it (with all types of agents). Typically you'll see the agent logs indicating they can't connect to the management server if this is the case. Try telnetting to 8250 on your mgmt server and see if suddenly your agent starts to work. - Si ________________________________ From: Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 6:04 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Issue with SSVM on KVM on master I should have pointed out that this is a Basic Zone. Also, there is only one KVM host in my one cluster. ________________________________________ From: Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 5:03 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Issue with SSVM on KVM on master Hi, I am trying to build a cloud making use of KVM system VMs. My SSVM VM comes up, but its agent doesn't seem to: http://imgur.com/a/Fo2ax [http://i.imgur.com/xdP9alM.jpg?fb]<http://imgur.com/a/Fo2ax> Imgur: The most awesome images on the Internet<http://imgur.com/a/Fo2ax> imgur.com Imgur: The most awesome images on the Internet. Thoughts on what might be going on here? Thanks! Mike
