Mike, can you confirm that this is not also an issue in 4.9?
On 30/03/17 08:21, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote:
This one may be a blocker (it’s currently marked as such):
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9849
It would be nice if one of our VMware gurus could take a look at it and see
what’s going on there.
The gist is you can’t live migrate a VM from one cluster to another in the
same datacenter (using either NFS or iSCSI as shared storage) (which I think
you should be able to do with VMware in CloudStack).
On 3/30/17, 12:06 AM, "Haijiao" <18602198...@163.com> wrote:
Seems only one blocker left. Are we close to release the RC2 ?
CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to
http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland
在2017年03月14 00时34分, "Rajani Karuturi"<raj...@apache.org>写道:
We still have below three blockers open. I will create RC once
they are fixed.
~ Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
On March 9, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Rajani Karuturi (raj...@apache.org)
wrote:
We currently have the below list of blockers:
BUGID - Summary - Assignee - Creator
CLOUDSTACK-9827 - Storage tags stored in multiple places -
Nicolas Vazquez - Mike Tutkowski - PR Ready
CLOUDSTACK-9811 - VR will not start, looking to configure eth3
while no such device exists on the VR. On KVM-CentOS6.8 physical
host - Unassigned - Boris Stoyanov
CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to
http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland
Can someone take a look at CLOUDSTACK-9811?
~ Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
On March 9, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Tutkowski, Mike
(mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote:
Hi,
Sure, I can pull that code and test.
I might have to wait until tomorrow, though, because I’m in the
middle of trying to reproduce CLOUDSTACK-9823. Once that is done,
I can move on to your PR.
Thanks!
Mike
On 3/8/17, 1:45 PM, "Nicolas Vazquez" <nicovazque...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi Mike,
Thanks for reporting this issue! We've been working on it and
created this
PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994. We've been
testing it
and seems to be solving the issues reported, can you please
repeat your
tests on it?
Thanks,
Nicolas
2017-03-07 21:52 GMT-03:00 Tutkowski, Mike
<mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>:
> Here’s the ticket:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9827
>
> On 3/7/17, 1:51 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
<mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote:
>
> Yes, I can open a ticket.
>
> > On Mar 7, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Sergey Levitskiy <
> sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote:
> >
> > Yes that’s the bug. Can you open a ticket for this? @
nvazquez can
> you take a look?
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 12:44 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
<mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > This does seem messed up.
> >
> > If I add a new primary storage and give it a storage tag,
the tag
> ends up in storage_pool_details.
> >
> > If I edit an existing storage pool’s storage tags, it places
them
> in storage_pool_tags.
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 1:39 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
<mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I believe I have found another bug (one that we should
either
> fix or examine in detail before releasing 4.10).
> >
> > It looks like we have a new table: cloud.storage_pool_tags.
> >
> > The addition of this table seems to have broken the
> listStorageTags API command. When this command runs, it
doesn’t pick up any
> storage tags for me (and I know I have one storage tag).
> >
> > This data used to be stored in the
cloud.storage_pool_details
> table. It’s good to put it in its own table, but will our
upgrade process
> move the existing tags from storage_pool_details to
storage_pool_tags?
> >
> > I have not yet opened a ticket for this. I want to examine
it
> a bit more before doing so.
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 8:10 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <
> mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote:
> >
> > No VM snapshot.
> >
> > I tried while the VM was in the Running state and then I
> also tried in the Stopped state. Same results.
> >
> >> On Mar 7, 2017, at 7:54 AM, Sergey Levitskiy <
> sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Is VM has an VMsnaphsot? Is VM in Stopped state?
> >>
> >> On 3/6/17, 10:32 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
<mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I seem to have found another blocker:
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9822
> >>
> >> On 3/6/17, 9:51 PM, "Rajani Karuturi" <raj...@apache.org>
wrote:
> >>
> >> PRs are ready for the blockers. Waiting for reviews and
test
> >> results. Once they are ready, I will merge them(and a few
more
> >> bug fixes) and create RC2 (probably tomorrow, Wednesday)
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> ~ Rajani
> >>
> >> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
> >>
> >> On March 3, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Rajani Karuturi (
> raj...@apache.org)
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> I will create RC2 on Monday with the fixes mentioned in my
> >> previous mail.
> >>
> >> ~ Rajani
> >>
> >> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
> >>
> >> On March 3, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Rohit Yadav
> >> (rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com) wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks Koushik, I did not realize Kishan had sent this
> already.
> >> Let's get either of the PRs merged and kick a RC2.
> >>
> >> Regards.
> >>
> >> ________________________________
> >> From: Koushik Das <koushik....@accelerite.com>
> >> Sent: 03 March 2017 14:14:56
> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0
> >>
> >> Looks like there is already a PR for the same issue
> >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1982 from Kishan.
> >>
> >> -Koushik
> >>
> >> On 03/03/17, 1:58 PM, "Rohit Yadav" <
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> -1 (binding)
> >>
> >> All, I've found an upgrade blocker. Pre 4.6 users are
required
> >> to seed 4.6 systemvmtemplate to proceed with the upgrade
> >> otherwise upgrade fails, and from 4.9 upgrade to 4.10 does
no
> >> check/enforcement that 4.10 based systemvmtemplate has been
> >> seeded/registered, nor the minimum required
systemvmtemplate
> >> version is changed from 4.6.0 to 4.10.0.
> >>
> >> After we have merged the strongswan/java8 PR, I had updated
> the
> >> upgrade docs on how to upgrade the systemvmtemplate here:
> >>
> >> http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-
> release-notes/en/4.10/upgrade/upgrade-4.9.html
> >>
> >> Using the above, I've tried to fix these issues here,
please
> >> review and merge for RC2:
> >>
> >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1983
> >>
> >> <https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1983>With above
> fix,
> >> the aim is that users only seed the 4.10 systemvmtemplate
> before
> >> upgrade and post-upgrade the upgrade paths fix the entries,
> >> global setting etc.
> >>
> >> Regards.
> >>
> >> ________________________________
> >> From: Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>
> >> Sent: 02 March 2017 22:39:08
> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0
> >>
> >> I rolled back to my master branch at
> >> da66b06e7d562393da2e4b52206943f8bad49d10 and it works.
> >>
> >> It appears something that went into after that commit has
> broken
> >> this. It looks like this SHA is about two weeks old and
that
> 43
> >> commits have gone into master since it.
> >>
> >> On 3/2/17, 7:06 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
> >> <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> According to where the code fails, though, it appears to be
a
> >> networking problem. If I set a breakpoint before the
failure
> and
> >> change a variable to say that security groups are not being
> used,
> >> then the VM starts.
> >>
> >> I think this is a recently introduced problem because I
have
> >> another branch based off of a slightly older version of
master
> >> and it works fine here.
> >>
> >>> On Mar 2, 2017, at 6:51 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion
> >> <pd...@cloudops.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Mike,
> >>> Try vm with at least 512MB for memory.
> >>>
> >>>> On Mar 1, 2017 15:01, "Tutkowski, Mike"
> >> <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I see the following exception when trying to deploy a
user VM
> >> in a Basic
> >>>> Zone with two XenServer 6.5 hosts in one cluster. My
system
> >> VMs have all
> >>>> deployed properly. The user template gets downloaded
fine. I
> >> can see the
> >>>> user VM begin to start on a XenServer host, then it goes
> >> away. We then
> >>>> automatically try on the other host. I can see the VM
begin
> >> to start there
> >>>> for a moment, then it goes away.
> >>>>
> >>>> I am just deploying the user VM’s template and root disk
to
> >> NFS (same
> >>>> place where the template and root disks of my system VMs
> >> are).
> >>>>
> >>>> I am using the built-in XenServer CentOS 5.6 (64 bit)
> >> template with 1
> >>>> vCPU, 500 MHz, and 256 MB memory.
> >>>>
> >>>> WARN [c.c.a.r.v.VirtualRoutingResource]
> >> (DirectAgent-7:ctx-35aded78)
> >>>> (logid:aab9c320) Expected 1 answers while executing
> >> VmDataCommand but
> >>>> received 2
> >>>> WARN [c.c.v.VirtualMachinePowerStateSyncImpl]
> >> (DirectAgentCronJob-14:ctx-27fb1ac3)
> >>>> (logid:2c342f23) VM state was updated but update time is
> >> null?! vm id: 6
> >>>> INFO [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
> >> (AsyncJobMgr-Heartbeat-1:ctx-2c7d2dce)
> >>>> (logid:a56a9a8c) Begin cleanup expired async-jobs
> >>>> INFO [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
> >> (AsyncJobMgr-Heartbeat-1:ctx-2c7d2dce)
> >>>> (logid:a56a9a8c) End cleanup expired async-jobs
> >>>> INFO [c.c.u.AccountManagerImpl]
> >> (AccountChecker-1:ctx-383a632c)
> >>>> (logid:541e9ba5) Found 0 removed accounts to cleanup
> >>>> INFO [c.c.u.AccountManagerImpl]
> >> (AccountChecker-1:ctx-383a632c)
> >>>> (logid:541e9ba5) Found 0 disabled accounts to cleanup
> >>>> INFO [c.c.u.AccountManagerImpl]
> >> (AccountChecker-1:ctx-383a632c)
> >>>> (logid:541e9ba5) Found 0 inactive domains to cleanup
> >>>> INFO [c.c.u.AccountManagerImpl]
> >> (AccountChecker-1:ctx-383a632c)
> >>>> (logid:541e9ba5) Found 0 disabled projects to cleanup
> >>>> WARN [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase]
> >> (DirectAgent-16:ctx-7c901443)
> >>>> (logid:aab9c320) callHostPlugin failed for cmd:
> >> default_network_rules with
> >>>> args secIps: 0:, vmName: i-2-6-VM, vmID: 6, vmIP:
> >> 10.117.40.53, vmMAC:
> >>>> 06:b2:f4:00:00:22, due to There was a failure
communicating
> >> with the
> >>>> plugin.
> >>>> WARN [c.c.h.x.r.w.x.CitrixStartCommandWrapper]
> >>>> (DirectAgent-16:ctx-7c901443) (logid:aab9c320) Catch
> >> Exception: class
> >>>> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException due to
> >>>> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException:
> >> callHostPlugin failed
> >>>> for cmd: default_network_rules with args secIps: 0:,
vmName:
> >> i-2-6-VM,
> >>>> vmID: 6, vmIP: 10.117.40.53, vmMAC: 06:b2:f4:00:00:22,
due to
> >> There was a
> >>>> failure communicating with the plugin.
> >>>> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException:
> >> callHostPlugin failed
> >>>> for cmd: default_network_rules with args secIps: 0:,
vmName:
> >> i-2-6-VM,
> >>>> vmID: 6, vmIP: 10.117.40.53, vmMAC: 06:b2:f4:00:00:22,
due to
> >> There was a
> >>>> failure communicating with the plugin.
> >>>> at
> >> com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.
> >>>> callHostPlugin(CitrixResourceBase.java:338)
> >>>> at
com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.wrapper.xenbase.
> >>>>
> >>
CitrixStartCommandWrapper.execute(CitrixStartCommandWrapper.
> java:188)
> >>>> at
com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.wrapper.xenbase.
> >>>>
> >>
CitrixStartCommandWrapper.execute(CitrixStartCommandWrapper.
> java:53)
> >>>> at com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.wrapper.
> >>>>
> >> xenbase.CitrixRequestWrapper.execute(CitrixRequestWrapper.
> java:122)
> >>>> at
> >> com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.
> >>>> executeRequest(CitrixResourceBase.java:1691)
> >>>> at
> >>
com.cloud.agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache$Task.runInContext(
> >>>> DirectAgentAttache.java:315)
> >>>> at
> >> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.
> ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(
> >>>> ManagedContextRunnable.java:49)
> >>>> at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.
> >>>>
DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56)
> >>>> at
> >> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.
> DefaultManagedContext.
> >>>> callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103)
> >>>> at
> >> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.
> DefaultManagedContext.
> >>>> runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53)
> >>>> at
> >> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.
> ManagedContextRunnable.run(
> >>>> ManagedContextRunnable.java:46)
> >>>> at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.
> >>>> call(Executors.java:511)
> >>>> at
java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
> >>>> at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$
> >>>>
> >> ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.
> java:180)
> >>>> at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$
> >>>>
ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
> >>>> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(
> >>>> ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
> >>>> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(
> >>>> ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
> >>>> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> >>>> WARN [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase]
> >> (DirectAgent-16:ctx-7c901443)
> >>>> (logid:aab9c320) Unable to start i-2-6-VM due to
> >>>> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException:
> >> callHostPlugin failed
> >>>> for cmd: default_network_rules with args secIps: 0:,
vmName:
> >> i-2-6-VM,
> >>>> vmID: 6, vmIP: 10.117.40.53, vmMAC: 06:b2:f4:00:00:22,
due to
> >> There was a
> >>>> failure communicating with the plugin.
> >>>> at
> >> com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.
> >>>> callHostPlugin(CitrixResourceBase.java:338)
> >>>> at
com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.wrapper.xenbase.
> >>>>
> >>
CitrixStartCommandWrapper.execute(CitrixStartCommandWrapper.
> java:188)
> >>>> at
com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.wrapper.xenbase.
> >>>>
> >>
CitrixStartCommandWrapper.execute(CitrixStartCommandWrapper.
> java:53)
> >>>> at com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.wrapper.
> >>>>
> >> xenbase.CitrixRequestWrapper.execute(CitrixRequestWrapper.
> java:122)
> >>>> at
> >> com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.
> >>>> executeRequest(CitrixResourceBase.java:1691)
> >>>> at
> >>
com.cloud.agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache$Task.runInContext(
> >>>> DirectAgentAttache.java:315)
> >>>> at
> >> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.
> ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(
> >>>> ManagedContextRunnable.java:49)
> >>>> at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.
> >>>>
DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56)
> >>>> at
> >> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.
> DefaultManagedContext.
> >>>> callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103)
> >>>> at
> >> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.
> DefaultManagedContext.
> >>>> runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53)
> >>>> at
> >> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.
> ManagedContextRunnable.run(
> >>>> ManagedContextRunnable.java:46)
> >>>> at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.
> >>>> call(Executors.java:511)
> >>>> at
java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
> >>>> at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$
> >>>>
> >> ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.
> java:180)
> >>>> at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$
> >>>>
ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
> >>>> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(
> >>>> ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
> >>>> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(
> >>>> ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
> >>>> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> >>>> INFO [o.a.c.e.o.NetworkOrchestrator]
> >> (Network-Scavenger-1:ctx-2058d5ac)
> >>>> (logid:bf8885a0) NetworkGarbageCollector uses '20'
seconds
> >> for GC interval.
> >>>> WARN [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase]
> >> (DirectAgent-16:ctx-7c901443)
> >>>> (logid:aab9c320) Unable to clean up VBD due to
> >>>> You gave an invalid object reference. The object may have
> >> recently been
> >>>> deleted. The class parameter gives the type of reference
> >> given, and the
> >>>> handle parameter echoes the bad value given.
> >>>> at
com.xensource.xenapi.Types.checkResponse(Types.java:693)
> >>>> at
> >>
com.xensource.xenapi.Connection.dispatch(Connection.java:395)
> >>>> at
> >> com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.
> XenServerConnectionPool$
> >>>>
> >> XenServerConnection.dispatch(XenServerConnectionPool.java:
> 457)
> >>>> at com.xensource.xenapi.VBD.unplug(VBD.java:1109)
> >>>> at
> >> com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.
> >>>> handleVmStartFailure(CitrixResourceBase.java:3576)
> >>>> at
com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.wrapper.xenbase.
> >>>>
> >>
CitrixStartCommandWrapper.execute(CitrixStartCommandWrapper.
> java:210)
> >>>> at
com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.wrapper.xenbase.
> >>>>
> >>
CitrixStartCommandWrapper.execute(CitrixStartCommandWrapper.
> java:53)
> >>>> at com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.wrapper.
> >>>>
> >> xenbase.CitrixRequestWrapper.execute(CitrixRequestWrapper.
> java:122)
> >>>> at
> >> com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.
> >>>> executeRequest(CitrixResourceBase.java:1691)
> >>>> at
> >>
com.cloud.agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache$Task.runInContext(
> >>>> DirectAgentAttache.java:315)
> >>>> at
> >> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.
> ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(
> >>>> ManagedContextRunnable.java:49)
> >>>> at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.
> >>>>
DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56)
> >>>> at
> >> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.
> DefaultManagedContext.
> >>>> callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103)
> >>>> at
> >> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.
> DefaultManagedContext.
> >>>> runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53)
> >>>> at
> >> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.
> ManagedContextRunnable.run(
> >>>> ManagedContextRunnable.java:46)
> >>>> at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.
> >>>> call(Executors.java:511)
> >>>> at
java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
> >>>> at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$
> >>>>
> >> ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.
> java:180)
> >>>> at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$
> >>>>
ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
> >>>> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(
> >>>> ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
> >>>> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(
> >>>> ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
> >>>> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> >>>> WARN [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase]
> >> (DirectAgent-16:ctx-7c901443)
> >>>> (logid:aab9c320) Unable to clean up VBD due to
> >>>> You gave an invalid object reference. The object may have
> >> recently been
> >>>> deleted. The class parameter gives the type of reference
> >> given, and the
> >>>> handle parameter echoes the bad value given.
> >>>> at
com.xensource.xenapi.Types.checkResponse(Types.java:693)
> >>>> at
> >>
com.xensource.xenapi.Connection.dispatch(Connection.java:395)
> >>>> at
> >> com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.
> XenServerConnectionPool$
> >>>>
> >> XenServerConnection.dispatch(XenServerConnectionPool.java:
> 457)
> >>>> at com.xensource.xenapi.VBD.unplug(VBD.java:1109)
> >>>> at
> >> com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.
> >>>> handleVmStartFailure(CitrixResourceBase.java:3576)
> >>>> at
com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.wrapper.xenbase.
> >>>>
> >>
CitrixStartCommandWrapper.execute(CitrixStartCommandWrapper.
> java:210)
> >>>> at
com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.wrapper.xenbase.
> >>>>
> >>
CitrixStartCommandWrapper.execute(CitrixStartCommandWrapper.
> java:53)
> >>>> at com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.wrapper.
> >>>>
> >> xenbase.CitrixRequestWrapper.execute(CitrixRequestWrapper.
> java:122)
> >>>> at
> >> com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.
> >>>> executeRequest(CitrixResourceBase.java:1691)
> >>>> at
> >>
com.cloud.agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache$Task.runInContext(
> >>>> DirectAgentAttache.java:315)
> >>>> at
> >> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.
> ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(
> >>>> ManagedContextRunnable.java:49)
> >>>> at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.
> >>>>
DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56)
> >>>> at
> >> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.
> DefaultManagedContext.
> >>>> callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103)
> >>>> at
> >> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.
> DefaultManagedContext.
> >>>> runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53)
> >>>> at
> >> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.
> ManagedContextRunnable.run(
> >>>> ManagedContextRunnable.java:46)
> >>>> at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.
> >>>> call(Executors.java:511)
> >>>> at
java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
> >>>> at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$
> >>>>
> >> ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.
> java:180)
> >>>> at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$
> >>>>
ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
> >>>> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(
> >>>> ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
> >>>> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(
> >>>> ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
> >>>> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> >>>> WARN [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase]
> >> (DirectAgent-16:ctx-7c901443)
> >>>> (logid:aab9c320) Unable to cleanup VIF
> >>>> You gave an invalid object reference. The object may have
> >> recently been
> >>>> deleted. The class parameter gives the type of reference
> >> given, and the
> >>>> handle parameter echoes the bad value given.
> >>>> at
com.xensource.xenapi.Types.checkResponse(Types.java:693)
> >>>> at
> >>
com.xensource.xenapi.Connection.dispatch(Connection.java:395)
> >>>> at
> >> com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.
> XenServerConnectionPool$
> >>>>
> >> XenServerConnection.dispatch(XenServerConnectionPool.java:
> 457)
> >>>> at com.xensource.xenapi.VIF.unplug(VIF.java:921)
> >>>> at
> >> com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.
> >>>> handleVmStartFailure(CitrixResourceBase.java:3584)
> >>>> at
com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.wrapper.xenbase.
> >>>>
> >>
CitrixStartCommandWrapper.execute(CitrixStartCommandWrapper.
> java:210)
> >>>> at
com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.wrapper.xenbase.
> >>>>
> >>
CitrixStartCommandWrapper.execute(CitrixStartCommandWrapper.
> java:53)
> >>>> at com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.wrapper.
> >>>>
> >> xenbase.CitrixRequestWrapper.execute(CitrixRequestWrapper.
> java:122)
> >>>> at
> >> com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.
> >>>> executeRequest(CitrixResourceBase.java:1691)
> >>>> at
> >>
com.cloud.agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache$Task.runInContext(
> >>>> DirectAgentAttache.java:315)
> >>>> at
> >> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.
> ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(
> >>>> ManagedContextRunnable.java:49)
> >>>> at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.
> >>>>
DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56)
> >>>> at
> >> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.
> DefaultManagedContext.
> >>>> callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103)
> >>>> at
> >> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.
> DefaultManagedContext.
> >>>> runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53)
> >>>> at
> >> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.
> ManagedContextRunnable.run(
> >>>> ManagedContextRunnable.java:46)
> >>>> at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.
> >>>> call(Executors.java:511)
> >>>> at
java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
> >>>> at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$
> >>>>
> >> ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.
> java:180)
> >>>> at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$
> >>>>
ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
> >>>> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(
> >>>> ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
> >>>> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(
> >>>> ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
> >>>> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> >>>> INFO [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> >> (Work-Job-Executor-2:ctx-bc104380
> >>>> job-25/job-27 ctx-8c946a5b) (logid:aab9c320) Unable to
start
> >> VM on
> >>>> Host[-2-Routing] due to Unable to start i-2-6-VM due to
> >>>> ERROR [c.c.v.VmWorkJobHandlerProxy]
> >> (Work-Job-Executor-2:ctx-bc104380
> >>>> job-25/job-27 ctx-8c946a5b) (logid:aab9c320) Invocation
> >> exception, caused
> >>>> by:
com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException:
> >> Unable to
> >>>> create a deployment for VM[User|i-2-6-VM]Scope=interface
> >>>> com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1
> >>>> INFO [c.c.v.VmWorkJobHandlerProxy]
> >> (Work-Job-Executor-2:ctx-bc104380
> >>>> job-25/job-27 ctx-8c946a5b) (logid:aab9c320) Rethrow
> >> exception
> >>>> com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException:
> >> Unable to create
> >>>> a deployment for VM[User|i-2-6-VM]Scope=interface
> >>>> com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1
> >>>> ERROR [c.c.v.VmWorkJobDispatcher]
> >> (Work-Job-Executor-2:ctx-bc104380
> >>>> job-25/job-27) (logid:aab9c320) Unable to complete
AsyncJobVO
> >> {id:27,
> >>>> userId: 2, accountId: 2, instanceType: null, instanceId:
> >> null, cmd:
> >>>> com.cloud.vm.VmWorkStart, cmdInfo:
> >> rO0ABXNyABhjb20uY2xvdWQudm0uVm
> >>>>
1Xb3JrU3RhcnR9cMGsvxz73gIAC0oABGRjSWRMAAZhdm9pZHN0ADBMY29tL2
> >>>>
Nsb3VkL2RlcGxveS9EZXBsb3ltZW50UGxhbm5lciRFeGNsdWRlTGlzdDtMAA
> >>>> ljbHVzdGVySWR0ABBMamF2YS9sYW5nL0xvbmc7TAAGaG9zdElkcQB-
> >>>>
AAJMAAtqb3VybmFsTmFtZXQAEkxqYXZhL2xhbmcvU3RyaW5nO0wAEXBoeXNp
> >>>>
> >> Y2FsTmV0d29ya0lkcQB-AAJMAAdwbGFubmVycQB-
> AANMAAVwb2RJZHEAfgACTAAGcG9vbE
> >>>>
> >> lkcQB-AAJMAAlyYXdQYXJhbXN0AA9MamF2YS
> 91dGlsL01hcDtMAA1yZXNlcnZhdGlvbklkcQB-
> >>>>
> >> AAN4cgATY29tLmNsb3VkLnZtLlZtV29ya5-
> ZtlbwJWdrAgAESgAJYWNjb3VudElkS
> >>>>
> >> gAGdXNlcklkSgAEdm1JZEwAC2hhbmRsZXJOYW1lcQB-
> AAN4cAAAAAAAAAACAAAAAAAAAAIAAA
> >>>>
AAAAAABnQAGVZpcnR1YWxNYWNoaW5lTWFuYWdlckltcGwAAAAAAAAAAHBwcH
> >>>>
BwcHBwc3IAEWphdmEudXRpbC5IYXNoTWFwBQfawcMWYNEDAAJGAApsb2FkRm
> >>>> FjdG9ySQAJdGhyZXNob2xkeHA_QAAAAAAADHcIAAAAEAAAAAF0AApWbV
> >>>> Bhc3N3b3JkdAAcck8wQUJYUUFEbk5oZG1Wa1gzQmhjM04zYjNKa3hw,
> >> cmdVersion: 0,
> >>>> status: IN_PROGRESS, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0,
result:
> >> null,
> >>>> initMsid: 52237617797, completeMsid: null, lastUpdated:
null,
> >> lastPolled:
> >>>> null, created: Wed Mar 01 12:51:32 MST 2017}, job
origin:25
> >>>> com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException:
> >> Unable to create
> >>>> a deployment for VM[User|i-2-6-VM]Scope=interface
> >>>> com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1
> >>>> at
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(
> >>>> VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:961)
> >>>> at
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(
> >>>> VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:4661)
> >>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
> >> Method)
> >>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> >>>> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> >>>> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> >>>> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> >>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> >>>> at com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobHandlerProxy.handleVmWorkJob(
> >>>> VmWorkJobHandlerProxy.java:107)
> >>>> at
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.handleVmWorkJob(
> >>>> VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:4822)
> >>>> at com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobDispatcher.runJob(
> >>>> VmWorkJobDispatcher.java:102)
> >>>> at
> >> org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.
> AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.
> >>>> runInContext(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:554)
> >>>> at
> >> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.
> ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(
> >>>> ManagedContextRunnable.java:49)
> >>>> at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.
> >>>>
DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56)
> >>>> at
> >> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.
> DefaultManagedContext.
> >>>> callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103)
> >>>> at
> >> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.
> DefaultManagedContext.
> >>>> runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53)
> >>>> at
> >> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.
> ManagedContextRunnable.run(
> >>>> ManagedContextRunnable.java:46)
> >>>> at org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.
> >>>> AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.run(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:502)
> >>>> at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.
> >>>> call(Executors.java:511)
> >>>> at
java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
> >>>> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(
> >>>> ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
> >>>> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(
> >>>> ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
> >>>> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> >>>> INFO [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobMonitor]
> >> (Work-Job-Executor-2:ctx-bc104380
> >>>> job-25/job-27) (logid:aab9c320) Remove job-27 from job
> >> monitoring
> >>>> WARN [o.a.c.alerts] (API-Job-Executor-1:ctx-f787201d
job-25
> >>>> ctx-56356c1a) (logid:aab9c320) alertType:: 8 //
> >> dataCenterId:: 1 //
> >>>> podId:: 1 // clusterId:: null // message:: Failed to
deploy
> >> Vm with Id: 6,
> >>>> on Host with Id: null
> >>>> ERROR [c.c.a.ApiAsyncJobDispatcher]
> >> (API-Job-Executor-1:ctx-f787201d
> >>>> job-25) (logid:aab9c320) Unexpected exception while
executing
> >>>>
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.vm.DeployVMCmdByAdmin
> >>>> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Unable
to
> >> start a VM due
> >>>> to insufficient capacity
> >>>> at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(
> >>>> VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:623)
> >>>> at
> >> org.apache.cloudstack.engine.cloud.entity.api.
> VMEntityManagerImpl.
> >>>> deployVirtualMachine(VMEntityManagerImpl.java:242)
> >>>> at org.apache.cloudstack.engine.cloud.entity.api.
> >>>>
> >> VirtualMachineEntityImpl.deploy(
> VirtualMachineEntityImpl.java:212)
> >>>> at com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl.startVirtualMachine(
> >>>> UserVmManagerImpl.java:4084)
> >>>> at com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl.startVirtualMachine(
> >>>> UserVmManagerImpl.java:3682)
> >>>> at com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl.startVirtualMachine(
> >>>> UserVmManagerImpl.java:3670)
> >>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
> >> Method)
> >>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> >>>> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> >>>> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> >>>> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> >>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> >>>> at org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.
> >>>> invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:333)
> >>>> at
> >>
org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.
> >>>> invokeJoinpoint(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:190)
> >>>> at
> >>
org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.
> >>>> proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:157)
> >>>> at org.apache.cloudstack.network.contrail.management.
> >>>> EventUtils$EventInterceptor.invoke(EventUtils.java:107)
> >>>> at
> >>
org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.
> >>>> proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:168)
> >>>> at com.cloud.event.ActionEventInterceptor.invoke(
> >>>> ActionEventInterceptor.java:51)
> >>>> at
> >>
org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.
> >>>> proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:168)
> >>>> at
> >> org.springframework.aop.interceptor.
> ExposeInvocationInterceptor.
> >>>> invoke(ExposeInvocationInterceptor.java:92)
> >>>> at
> >>
org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.
> >>>> proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:179)
> >>>> at org.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.
> >>>> invoke(JdkDynamicAopProxy.java:213)
> >>>> at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy186.startVirtualMachine(Unknown
> >> Source)
> >>>> at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.vm.
> >>>> DeployVMCmdByAdmin.execute(DeployVMCmdByAdmin.java:50)
> >>>> at
> >>
com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:150)
> >>>> at com.cloud.api.ApiAsyncJobDispatcher.runJob(
> >>>> ApiAsyncJobDispatcher.java:108)
> >>>> at
> >> org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.
> AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.
> >>>> runInContext(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:554)
> >>>> at
> >> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.
> ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(
> >>>> ManagedContextRunnable.java:49)
> >>>> at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.
> >>>>
DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56)
> >>>> at
> >> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.
> DefaultManagedContext.
> >>>> callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103)
> >>>> at
> >> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.
> DefaultManagedContext.
> >>>> runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53)
> >>>> at
> >> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.
> ManagedContextRunnable.run(
> >>>> ManagedContextRunnable.java:46)
> >>>> at org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.
> >>>> AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.run(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:502)
> >>>> at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.
> >>>> call(Executors.java:511)
> >>>> at
java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
> >>>> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(
> >>>> ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
> >>>> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(
> >>>> ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
> >>>> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> >>>> Caused by:
> >> com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException:
> >>>> Unable to create a deployment for
> >> VM[User|i-2-6-VM]Scope=interface
> >>>> com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1
> >>>> at
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(
> >>>> VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:961)
> >>>> at
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(
> >>>> VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:4661)
> >>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
> >> Method)
> >>>> ... 18 more
> >>>>
> >>>> On 3/1/17, 8:52 AM, "Pierre-Luc Dion"
<pdion...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Do we support centos6 with this 4.10 on jdk8?
> >>>>
> >>>> Because I did not had much success to install 4.10 jdk8
on
> >> centos6
> >>>> and it
> >>>> would make more sense to drop support of centos6 so our
> >> packages would
> >>>> use
> >>>> centos7 with distro packages for tomcat7 and jdk8. Should
> >> also be the
> >>>> same
> >>>> with ubuntu 16.04 that use jdk8 and tomcat7 by default ?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 9:01 AM, Rene Moser
> >> <m...@renemoser.net> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi
> >>>>>
> >>>>> While not be directly related to the clodustack java
source
> >> code, any
> >>>>> RPM created using the specs from the repo e.g. from
> >> packages/centos7
> >>>>> and proceeding an upgrade, will hit CLOUDSTACK-9765, PR
> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1923 fixes the
> >> issue.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards
> >>>>> René
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 03/01/2017 02:12 AM, Rajani Karuturi wrote:
> >>>>>> Hi All,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I've created a 4.10.0.0 release, with the following
> >> artifacts up
> >>>> for a
> >>>>> vote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Git Branch and Commit
> >>>>>>
SH:https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.
> >>>>> git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.10.0.0-RC20170301T0634
> >>>>>> Commit:7c1d003b5269b375d87f4f6cfff8a144f0608b67
> >>>>>> <https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.
> >>>>>
git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.10.0.0-RC20170301T0634Commit:
> >>>>> 7c1d003b5269b375d87f4f6cfff8a144f0608b67>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available
at
> >> the same
> >>>>>>
> >>
location):https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/
> >>>> 4.10.0.0/
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> PGP release keys (signed using
> >>>>>> CBB44821):https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/
> >>>> cloudstack/KEYS
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please
be
> >> sure to
> >>>>>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [ ] +1 approve
> >>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> >>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ~Rajani
> >>>>>> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> >> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com
( http://www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com )
> >> ( http://www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com )>
> >> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
> >> @shapeblue
> >>
> >> DISCLAIMER
> >> ==========
> >> This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential
> information
> >> which is the property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems
> >> business. It is intended only for the use of the individual
or
> >> entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the
intended
> >> recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy,
> print,
> >> distribute or use this message. If you have received this
> >> communication in error, please notify the sender and delete
> all
> >> copies of this message. Accelerite, a Persistent Systems
> business
> >> does not accept any liability for virus infected mails.
> >>
> >> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> >> www.shapeblue.com ( http://www.shapeblue.com )
( http://www.shapeblue.com )
> >> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
> >> @shapeblue
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
