Great work Daan!

paul.an...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
3 London Bridge Street,  3rd floor, News Building, London  SE1 9SGUK
@shapeblue
  
 


-----Original Message-----
From: Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> 
Sent: 14 February 2020 18:45
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS]/[PROPOSAL] draft PRs

Thanks all for the swift responses. Let's just start doing this. No need for a 
vote until someone starts a discussion on the subject. Agree?

On Fri, 14 Feb 2020, 17:04 Rohit Yadav, <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> wrote:

> +1 (better than changing the PR subject, putting wip-labels or [WIP])
>
> Regards,
>
> Rohit Yadav
>
> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> https://www.shapeblue.com
>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, February 14, 2020 17:33
> *To:* dev <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
> *Subject:* [DISCUSS]/[PROPOSAL] draft PRs
>
> devs, I thought I had already sent a mail about this but i cannot find it.
> I'm sure i had mentioned it somewhere (probably on github).
> this is a follow up on [1] and hopefully you'll agree, a slight 
> improvement.
>
> here it comes:
>
> At the moment we are creating PRs with a [WIP] or [DO NOT MERGE] tag 
> in the title. This title stands the chance of being merged once we 
> agree the PR is ready for merge. It also clutters the title.
>
> Github has introduced a nice feature a while ago; draft PR. When 
> creating a PR you can opt not to open it for merge but as draft. 
> Choose a button left of the "Create pull request" button, marked 
> "Create draft PR". It will be a full PR with all CI and discussion 
> possibilities open. The only difference is the merge button being 
> disabled. One will than have to make/mark it "ready for merge" before it 
> *can* be merged.
>
> [1]
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f3f0988907f85bfc2cfcb0fbcde831037
> f9b1cb017e94bcdddd68932%40%3Cdev.cloudstack.apache.org%3E
> please shoot any comments you may have back at me, thanks
>
> --
> Daan
>

Reply via email to