From: Marc Portier > > just dotting the i's and crossing the t's > (don't want to be nagging) > > Reinhard Pötz wrote: > > <snip /> > > > [D] All flow interpreters[3] are Avalon components and declared > > in the cocoon.xonf: > > > > <flow-interpreters default="[yourLanguage]" > logger="[yourLogger]"> > > ... > > </flow-interpreters> > > > > our proposal was about having also non-interpreter > implementations of the 'generalized flow' concept > > so while the xconf remark is totally valid, the link in the same > paragraph to our proposal might be a bit misleading... > > > > > [3] I'm aware of Sylvain's and Marc's proposal on changing > > the scope of available controllers. I contacted Sylvain off-list > > and the said that they want to come up with a concrete > > implementation > > - we felt the group not able to really conclude the discussion at > this point, and don't want to be the PITA that blocks releases. > > - we think code will say more then the wiki write up: > (while we do appear to make some 'theoretical' sense, and got > some people into the thinking apparently, I still can't shake off > the feeling that some still carry some YAGNI-feeling around this) > > - we are committed to do our discussions, and status reporting > towards this implementation on this list hoping that the road to > it will be a helpful tutorial into our thinking here > > > of their proposal in the future and this should *not* influence > > the release of Cocoon 2.1 as the proposed changes would > only have > > a small impact on the *public* interfaces. > > > > - we are convinced at this stage (and wil do our best to keep it > as such) that the impact on the public interfaces will be indeed > limited > > - we are hoping on the other side that our lenient position at > this stage is not going to be cutting us back in re-considering > some of this in the future.
Thanks for the clarification! Cheers, Reinhard
