On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> > Stephan Michels wrote, On 14/07/2003 12.32: > ... > > All JavaScript Code can be transform into Assembler, or Basic. That's > > not the point. A programming language should make the implementation > > of a solution for a given problem as easy as possible. > > We have already discussed what language to use in the past, and > Javascript won. That was months ago, and I don't remember that in the > meantime there have been changes to the underlying assumptions. This is okay, I belong to the minority. > Personally, as I said, I welcome the creation of support for other > languages for the FOM, but we should not do it here in cocoon, at least > not now. Agreed, as long as other implementations are possible, and the names not implies that javascript is the only solution. I also write my own JXTemplateTransformer outside of Cocoon, which fulfill my needs better. > But we are talking about similar procedutral languages, here, not about > using a different paradigm for the flow; FSMs are a a totally different > way of approaching the problem IMHO. Come on, a FSM is not _complete_ different. You can also combine the continuation concept with a FSM. > What I would like to see? BSF support for continuations, and the use of > this BSF from Cocoon. If someone has some time to spare... Yet another scripting language ;-) Stephan.
