On 8/5/03 4:29 AM, "Steven Noels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 29/07/2003 9:28 Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > >> I'll write something up. > > I needed something for a conference I'll be speaking, and I came up with: > > "Apache Cocoon is a compelling XML-centric framework for building > serious web applications. Different from traditional development > frameworks, Cocoon provides XML pipelining and aggregation for content > composition cleanly separated from a flow definition and execution > context, offering an ideal platform for both content- and logic-driven > web applications." > > How does that sound? > "content- and logic-driven" is a little difficult to understand. When it comes down to it, neither really means anything (I know what you mean, but I understand your sentence in a cocoon context). How about this: "Different from traditional development frameworks, Cocoon provides XML pipelining and aggregation for content composition cleanly separated from a flow definition and execution context. This separation of concerns makes it an ideal platform for both publishing- and task-based web applications." "Task-based" may not be the best choice of words, but it "logic-driven" is a little vague, IMO.
