Maybe start 2.5, just to be in line with Linux? ;-P
Screw that, let's just skip a couple major versions, everyone's doing it now, how does "Cocoon 5.0" look? :)
Better yet, let's just change the name alltogether:
Cocoon XP Cocoon MX Cocoon MX 2004
I just love Macromedia, at least they admit MX doesn't mean anything:
What does "MX" mean?
The "MX" moniker is not an acronym and doesn't have a literal translation.They add the MX, and then they realize they have to release a new version so they tack a "2004" on the end.
In all seriousness, I'm all for 2.2, but what sorts of loose ends are there that could be tied up for 2.1.x? Howabout a push to clear out some bugs from bugzilla?
Regards,
Tony
