Tony Collen wrote:
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:

Maybe start 2.5, just to be in line with Linux? ;-P

Screw that, let's just skip a couple major versions, everyone's doing it now, how does "Cocoon 5.0" look? :)


Better yet, let's just change the name alltogether:

Cocoon XP
Cocoon MX
Cocoon MX 2004

I just love Macromedia, at least they admit MX doesn't mean anything:

What does "MX" mean?
The "MX" moniker is not an acronym and doesn't have a literal translation.

What about renaming the next release to an unpronounceable set of symbols, like Prince, or that Led Zepplin album? I'd suggest "!&#".


In all seriousness, I'm all for 2.2, but what sorts of loose ends are there that could be tied up for 2.1.x? Howabout a push to clear out some bugs from bugzilla?

Me too, but a push for bug fix (and I'd like to see a docs blitz) wouldn't need to hold up creating the repository and working out the best way of working two trees at once would it?


By the way, I thought we were planning on breaking from ECM in 2.2 because it would make blocks easier among other great benefits. Is this still a thought? That would certainly make a new repo an attractive thing.

Geoff



Reply via email to