On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Andrew Savory wrote: > On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Steven Noels wrote: > > > IMHO, it's simply unworkable to have major stuff going on in one module, > > over two branches, at the same time. > > In CVS, I've always found branches == pain.
Can you explain you pains? I've found it quite usefull to have a main branch for firther development an one for maintenance. > I appreciate a move to something like subversion is quite a revolution, > and I'd suggest it's something best kept for the next "revolution" in > Cocoon (like the jump from 1.x to 2.x). Still IIRC Apache does not use SVN as an infrastructure equivalent to CVS. > But I'd really like to see a 2.2 module created now. Should we put it to a > vote? What's the diffrence between a new repository and a branch (I know: performance) -- Giacomo Pati Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
