> From: Gianugo Rabellino > > Antonio Gallardo wrote: > > hi: > > > > Please vote about this proposal: > > Antonio, > > there's no need to vote in order for you to add code into > CVS. Just go > ahead and commit. :-) > > This said, this is not a vote but a few questions: > > 1. I still don't see why it shouldn't be part of the database > block. I > understand that dealing with databases directly (manual SQL) > or through > a persistence layer is somewhat different, but then again, with the > _current_ blocks, I don't quite see the need for "balkanization" of > database handling stuff;
I don't like this because after Antonio's checkin the database block wouldn't be "stable" anymore (of course I don't mean the code but the community behind the new code) > > 2. in case such need exists, I'd rather see a "persistence" > block with a > set of different implementations (OJB being just one of those). I would really like to see this too. The problem is that AFAIK the other possible ORB frameworks are either commercial or don't have a ASF compatible licence. Although +1 for "persistence" instead of OJB. Reinhard
