Sylvain Wallez dijo: > Gianugo Rabellino wrote: > >> Antonio Gallardo wrote: >> >>> hi: >>> >>> Please vote about this proposal: >> >> >> Antonio, >> >> there's no need to vote in order for you to add code into CVS. Just go >> ahead and commit. :-) > > > Yeah. Just do it ;-) > >> This said, this is not a vote but a few questions: >> >> 1. I still don't see why it shouldn't be part of the database block. I >> understand that dealing with databases directly (manual SQL) or >> through a persistence layer is somewhat different, but then again, >> with the _current_ blocks, I don't quite see the need for >> "balkanization" of database handling stuff; > > > Mmmh... the current database block is related to direct SQL-access, > which is what OJB wants to hide. So I would go for another block, even > more considering that it brings new jars that you don't need when using > e.g. ESQL.
Yep. You answer this better than me! :-D The same apply when we will use Hibernate or other related technology. Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo
