I had previously seen that post on lambda-the-ultimate, and I liked the arguments.continuation idea. However, it seemed rather low priority (at least for me). Your posts prompted me to implement it (which turned out to be very easy). I don't think we have communication problems, rather I think we have had some disagreements. But in this case we do agree.
Regards,
Chris
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Christopher Oliver wrote:
Ok, ok. I've checked in an implemention of arguments.continuation into the Rhino cvs on cocoondev.org. Please test it and let me know if it's ok. If so, someone can go ahead and update the cocoon cvs.
Chris, I don't know what's your state of mind about this (we already had communication problems in the past), but I'd like to make it clear that I don't want to impose anything. I simply had problems understanding the real behaviour of continuations, and this "new Continuation()" was part of these problems. I would have been happier with some agreement from you, rather than a simple "ok, ok" that makes me think you were bored by my remarks.
I also would like some feedback from other non-Schemers around there to know their feelings about this. Or am I the only one that digged so deep in the flowscript internals ?
Sylvain
