Re: The granularity of continuations

[mratliff]

Sylvain,

Speaking as someone who understands continuations about as well as they do Attic Greek (menin aedie Thea is about as far as I have gotten), I appreciated the publication of your investigations.  I understand continuations a bit better now.  Thank you.

--Michael

Sylvain Wallez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 09/28/2003 11:36:00 PM:

> Christopher Oliver wrote:
>
> > Ok, ok. I've checked in an implemention of arguments.continuation into
> > the Rhino cvs on cocoondev.org.  Please test it and let me know if
> > it's ok.  If so, someone can go ahead and update the cocoon cvs.
>
>
> Chris, I don't know what's your state of mind about this (we already had
> communication problems in the past), but I'd like to make it clear that
> I don't want to impose anything. I simply had problems understanding the
> real behaviour of continuations, and this "new Continuation()" was part
> of these problems. I would have been happier with some agreement from
> you, rather than a simple "ok, ok" that makes me think you were bored by
> my remarks.
>
> I also would like some feedback from other non-Schemers around there to
> know their feelings about this. Or am I the only one that digged so deep
> in the flowscript internals ?
>
> Sylvain
>
> --
> Sylvain Wallez                                  Anyware Technologies
> http://www.apache.org/~sylvain           http://www.anyware-tech.com
> { XML, Java, Cocoon, OpenSource }*{ Training, Consulting, Projects }
> Orixo, the opensource XML business alliance  -  http://www.orixo.com
>
>