Stefano Mazzocchi dijo: > The fact that you are distributing a modified LGPL library requires > that the patches you apply are under LGPL as well, but only those (if > you stick one interpretation of LGPL that is not viral for java classes > that import LGPLed ones. in another interpretation, there is no > difference between LGPL and GPL for java code... nobody knows which > interpretation can be said correct and the FSF never issued a statement > that can be said official on this matter).
If the LGPL is viral for Java, then the same apply for any OO language, i.e.: C++. Is that correct? Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo.
