On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 19:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG > RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT > <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10203>. > ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND > INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. > > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10203 > > Docs referenced by XSLT's document() are not included in cache validity > > > > > > ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-10-08 17:28 ------- > Ah, ok you're right. Although I guess that it's technical possible it will get > even more messy than the whole caching code is already. > In my opinion, it's sufficient to document this behaviour. Users can take care > of it - if they know. > > On the other hand, I think this is more a feature request than a bug. So I > suggest to add this to our feature request page at the wiki and close this bug. > Or you can start a vote if this is more a bug or more a feature request first.
I agree it's a feature request and added it to the wiki page. However, can't we use bugzilla also to track (serious) feature requests? There are a couple of other "enhancement" requests in there, should we also close them and add them to the wiki page? -- Bruno Dumon http://outerthought.org/ Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
