--- Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We talked about this at the GT and today again on irc, the goal is to > allow structured comments in sitemaps, for example: <snip example/> > The TreeProcessor would ignore everything in the annotations namespace > (Sylvain suggests adding a filtering XMLPipe just after the parser that > reads the sitemap file). > > Suggested namespace is http://apache.org/cocoon/sitemap/annotations/1.0 > > WDYaT?
+1 to the concept and the namespace. I would also like to see any top-level elements outside the sitemap namespace be stripped by the filtering XMLPipe. This would allow other "files" to be embedded in the sitemap and extracted using a common stylesheet. When dealing with small files this could reduce the file count terror I sometimes feel with Cocoon. PS: Don't tell anyone, but really I would like to do it the other way around; use a stylesheet to extract the sitemap from a composite file and be able to use the cocoon: protocol in map:mount. This is a "little" drastic, so I am saying it very very quietly :) --Tim Larson be ignored __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now http://companion.yahoo.com/
