--- Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We talked about this at the GT and today again on irc, the goal is to allow structured comments in sitemaps, for example:<snip example/>
The TreeProcessor would ignore everything in the annotations namespace (Sylvain suggests adding a filtering XMLPipe just after the parser that reads the sitemap file).
Suggested namespace is http://apache.org/cocoon/sitemap/annotations/1.0
WDYaT?
+1 to the concept and the namespace.
I would also like to see any top-level elements outside the sitemap namespace be stripped by the filtering XMLPipe.
This would allow other "files" to be embedded in the sitemap and extracted using a common stylesheet. When dealing with small files this could reduce the file count terror I sometimes feel with Cocoon.
Uh? What kind of "files" do you want to embed?
PS: Don't tell anyone, but really I would like to do it the other way around; use a stylesheet to extract the sitemap from a composite file and be able to use the cocoon: protocol in map:mount. This is a "little" drastic, so I am saying it very very quietly :)
IMO, this is a better approach than embedding "foreign files" in the sitemap. Just use a "cocoon:" to filter out these foreign things and you've got a clean sitemap.
... or embed them in a <note:application-data> element!
Sylvain
-- Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies http://www.apache.org/~sylvain http://www.anyware-tech.com { XML, Java, Cocoon, OpenSource }*{ Training, Consulting, Projects } Orixo, the opensource XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
