On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 20:45, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> On 13 Dec 2003, at 11:05, Rolf Kulemann wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 19:53, Rolf Kulemann wrote:
> >> On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 19:04, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> >>> On 13 Dec 2003, at 02:19, Rolf Kulemann wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Is Epoz saving XHTML or HTML?
> >>
> >> Depends on the loaded markup to edit. If I load clean XHTML Epoz seems
> >> to add only valid xhtml.
> >
> > Uuups, when inserting a table via epoz, an (invalid?) attribute gets
> > inserted into table tag. See this:
> >
> > <table _moz_resizing="true" .....
> >
> > All other edit actions result in valid xhtml.
>
> I don't care about "valid" XML, but about "well formed" one. That's the
> important difference in cocoon-land.
Ok, so Epoz is generating wellformed xhtml. (?)
>
> I would be against making StreamGenerator tidy aware, but for anything
> else go for it.
Sorry, what do you mean with tidy aware and go for it? (sorry)
>
> --
> Stefano.
--
Rolf Kulemann
Most people can't understand how others can blow their noses differently
than they do.
-- Turgenev
PGP/GPG public key:
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6B4EA7EA
