Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> write: > > Ugo Cei wrote: > > > Unico Hommes wrote: > > > >> I think that as a software product that is known for its innovative > >> nature it is *very* important in the interest of Cocoon to refuse > >> being impaired by the immobility of bureaucracratic > organisations. We > >> are having a small crisis on our hands ATM regarding our > persistent > >> store component and if I was reading Pier correctly he was > willing to > >> dedicate some time towards a solution to this problem. > >> > >> One of the main attractions of the jdk 1.4 is its NIO package, and > >> it's supposed to be a major improvement in Javas IO > performance. With > >> 1.4 being available for - what more than two years? - and > 1.5 already > >> on the horizon it is IMHO the right time to upgrade. > > > > > > Since we don't have a NIO-based implementation of the persistent > > store, > > yet, why upgrade now? When we have it, I'll be more than > willing to vote > > +1. > > Ugo, > > this is chicken-egg problem: nobody is going to implement > something on > 1.4-only API if they aren't sure the community is going to accept it.
LOL: apparently we are thinking completely along the same lines today. I just wrote egg-actly the same thing before I saw your response...
