> From: Joerg Heinicke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > But if someone provides a really useful 1.4 thing > like the mentioned "NIO-based implementation of the persistent store" > I'm for 1.4 of course.
I'm more of a user than a developer of Cocoon, but I'd say that if someone can provide a reasonable argument that 1.4 would bring some useful things, I'd be for 1.4. I.e. no need to implement the NIO-based store, just some statement to the effect that it would bring performance benefits. (In this case, even with non-blocking NIO reads and writes, you'll still have to wait for the whole store.read() to finish, since the rest of the system isn't built around a non-blocking architecture. I therefore think that a NIO-based persistent store will not bring any significant performance boost without some serious re-architecting.) /LS
