another +1 to 'cforms' over 'forms'
Doesn't the "c" stand for "Cocoon"? If it does, I find it somewhat redundant, especially in a package name: org.apache.cocoon.forms == org.apache.cocoon.cocoon.forms?
And what if someday we develop a new forms framework, do we call it "dforms"? ;-)
I propose to use just "forms" as the block name, "Cocoon Forms" in the docs, and do a s/woody/forms/ in the package names and namespaces.
Just MHO,
Ugo
